Philip Blundell writes:
> On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 19:27, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Philip Blundell writes:
> > > On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 17:04, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > > 3.0 fixes this problem, but then maintainers must hand-build using
> > > > g77-3.0, which is not a viable long-term solution.
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 19:27, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Philip Blundell writes:
> > On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 17:04, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > 3.0 fixes this problem, but then maintainers must hand-build using
> > > g77-3.0, which is not a viable long-term solution. I know some arches
> > > have 3.
Philip Blundell writes:
> On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 17:04, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > 3.0 fixes this problem, but then maintainers must hand-build using
> > g77-3.0, which is not a viable long-term solution. I know some arches
> > have 3.0 as their default compiler. So, what are the criteria, and
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 17:04, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> 3.0 fixes this problem, but then maintainers must hand-build using
> g77-3.0, which is not a viable long-term solution. I know some arches
> have 3.0 as their default compiler. So, what are the criteria, and
> what's the procedure, for cha
Greetings,
g77-2.95 has a nasty bug on ARM which prevents linking of any FORTRAN
libs (#90363). Our current status is that all packages with binaries
which link to FORTRAN libs fail to build! This bug is not likely to be
fixed.
3.0 fixes this problem, but then maintainers must hand-build usin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:16:36PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 13:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:29:15PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 02:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > > > gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -fPIC -g -O2 -c
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Changwoo Ryu
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: warning on valid escape sequence in C string & invalid result.
>Severity: serious
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: wrong-code
>Release: 3.0.4 (Debian testing/unstabl
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Changwoo Ryu
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: warning on valid escape sequence in C string & invalid result.
>Severity: serious
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: wrong-code
>Release: 3.0.4 (Debian testing/unstabl
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 13:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:29:15PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 02:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > > gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -fPIC -g -O2 -c coxfit2.c -o coxfit2.o
> > > coxfit2.c: In function `coxfit2':
> > > c
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:29:15PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 02:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -fPIC -g -O2 -c coxfit2.c -o coxfit2.o
> > coxfit2.c: In function `coxfit2':
> > coxfit2.c:352: Internal compiler error:
> > coxfit2.c:352: intern
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:35:32AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > reassign 135943 gcc
> > Bug#135943: r-recommended_1.4.1-1 fails to autobuild on m68k
> > Bug reassigned from package `r-recommended' to `gcc
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:33:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#136045: Unable to compile large source trees
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 02:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -fPIC -g -O2 -c coxfit2.c -o coxfit2.o
> coxfit2.c: In function `coxfit2':
> coxfit2.c:352: Internal compiler error:
> coxfit2.c:352: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 2883 243 245 (set (reg:DF 16 %fp0)
Package: g++-2.95
Hi,
when I try to compile for example qt-x11 (with debian/rules binary-arch)
after some time the build process stops with an error message like:
g++ -D_REENTRANT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -c -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/src/qt-x11-2.3.1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -pipe -fno-exceptions
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:13:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#135943: r-recommended_1.4.1-1 fails to
autobuild on m68k
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 135943 gcc
> Bug#135943: r-recommended_1.4.1-1 fails to autobuild on m68k
> Bug reassigned from package `r-recommended' to `gcc'.
>
> > retitle 135943 gcc on m68k has internal error in coxfit2.c in surv
16 matches
Mail list logo
