FYI -randolph
- Forwarded message from Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:10:30 -0800
From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: gcc profiling broken on Linux/ia64?
Reply-To: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Say Good
Say Good-Bye to Your Monthly
Phone Bill!
Zero cents per minute
One flat monthly rate - nothing more
Crystal Clear service - nation wide
Talk as much as you want, whenever you want!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 135305 normal
Bug#135305: gcc-doc: Installing gcc-doc removes g++, gcc, etc
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 135305 ftp.debian.org
Bug#135305: gcc-doc: Installing gcc-doc removes g++, gcc, etc
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-doc' to `ftp.
severity 135305 normal
reassign 135305 ftp.debian.org
retitle 135305 Please remove "gcc" source package and associated -doc binary
packages from testing
thanks
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:16:13 +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> So I guess the right thing to do would be to reassign this bug to
>
Accepted:
cpp-3.0_3.0.4-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/cpp-3.0_3.0.4-1_m68k.deb
fastjar_3.0.4-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/fastjar_3.0.4-1_m68k.deb
fixincludes_3.0.4-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/fixincludes_3.0.4-1_m68k.deb
g++-3.0_3.0.4-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/g++-3
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:57:53 +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> The real bug seems to be that gcc-doc, g77-doc, gpc-doc and cpp-doc are
> still available in testing - AFAICT the should be removed from testing.
> (The problem does not occur with sid, as these packages are no longer
> available
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 04:48:03 +0100, Erik Warendorph wrote:
> # apt-get -uyds install gcc-doc
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> g++ g++-2.95 gcc gcc-2.95 libstdc++2.10-dev task-c++-dev
> The following NEW
7 matches
Mail list logo