Re: javac

2002-02-04 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 15:27, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > For example, would "Build-Depends: gcj" be acceptable? > > > > gcj only works on i386, powerpc, m68k, sparc, s390, alpha and ia64. > > Hmm, do you mean it does not work on arm, hppa, mips and mipsel? > Is this considered a release-critical bu

Re: javac

2002-02-04 Thread Santiago Vila
> > For example, would "Build-Depends: gcj" be acceptable? > > gcj only works on i386, powerpc, m68k, sparc, s390, alpha and ia64. Hmm, do you mean it does not work on arm, hppa, mips and mipsel? Is this considered a release-critical bug? What about the other java compilers? It is true, for examp

Re: GCC and -pthread

2002-02-04 Thread Phil Edwards
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 01:33:42AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > It is odd that gcc supports this on some platforms and not on others. On > i386, it appears to merely add -lpthread to the command line. It doesn't > even produce a warning. This has been a thorn in our (our == gcc maintainers) si