> All the -3.0 packages don't depend, recommend or even suggest the
> packages making it possible (especially on hppa where -3.0 is
> the default compiler) to install just gcc-3.0 and not have a gcc
> symlink which is probably not a good thing?
The 'gcc' package is hardcoded to gcc-2.95 right no
Package: libgcj2
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
>
> >apt-get install java-virtual-machine
> >
> >This will list all available packages providing a JVM.
> >
> I trust gcj/libgcj is so listed? (I'm not running Debian on my
> own machines so I can't check easily.)
Package: libgcj2
Severity: serious
Library packages should not include binaries. Please see policy section 11.3.
...
If your package has some run-time support programs which use the shared
library you must not put them in the shared library package. If you do that
then you won't be able to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 117513 g++-2.95
Bug#117513: openc++: segfault or "Error 139" compiling anything, even empty file
Bug reassigned from package `openc++' to `g++-2.95'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
The current gcc-3.0 package in unstable has libffi enabled for the
Hurd. Does libffi build on the Hurd, or should libffi disabled again?
Thanks, Matthias
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 04:07:12PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> Looks like there's a strength-reduce optimization bug in g++-3.0.2 on
> hppa
For those reading this on gcc-patches, there's a .ii at
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2001-November/014491.html
This is with hpp
6 matches
Mail list logo
