Bug#107587: marked as done (gcc and gcc-3.0 should support alternatives)

2001-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2001 22:40:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#107587: gcc and gcc-3.0 should support alternatives has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#107633: Error in std library headers

2001-08-03 Thread Christopher Currie
Package: libstdc++3-dev Version: 1:3.0.1-0pre010801 I cannot compile a trivial C++ program because of errors in the standard library headers. Example program: test.cc #include int main(); Example execution: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++-3.0 test.cc In file included from /usr/includ

Bug#107610: cc1: /tmp/ccoDern9.i: Invalid argument

2001-08-03 Thread Sven
Package: gcc Version: Version: 2:2.95.4-5 Hello, ... i just finished a new unstable install, and got the following error as i wanted to build a package : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/ocaml/ocaml-3.02$ gcc -o /tmp/gcc /tmp/gcc.c cc1: /tmp/ccoDern9.i: Invalid argument /tmp/gcc.c is just a plain em

Bug#107569: gcc-3.0-sparc64_3.0.1-0pre010801_sparc fail apt-get install

2001-08-03 Thread Matthias Klose
I'm unable to test this on sparc (Ben?). Anyway: - which packages and versions are installed before? (gcc-3.0, gcc-3.0-sparc64, gcc-3.0-base) - does removing the old packages (gcc-3.0, gcc-3.0-sparc64) work around the problem? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: gcc-3.0-sparc64 > Version

Bug#107569: gcc-3.0-sparc64_3.0.1-0pre010801_sparc fail apt-get install

2001-08-03 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 07:09:47PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'm unable to test this on sparc (Ben?). Anyway: > > - which packages and versions are installed before? (gcc-3.0, > gcc-3.0-sparc64, gcc-3.0-base) > > - does removing the old packages (gcc-3.0, gcc-3.0-sparc64) work > around t

Bug#107587: gcc and gcc-3.0 should support alternatives

2001-08-03 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-5 Severity: wishlist gcc should use 'update-alternative', so that user can define easily (and in a std manner) the default compiler. giacomo -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux gmiabla 2.4.8-pre3 #3 Tue Jul

Bug#107569: gcc-3.0-sparc64_3.0.1-0pre010801_sparc fail apt-get install

2001-08-03 Thread Matanuki
Package: gcc-3.0-sparc64 Version: 1:3.0.1-0pre010801 Severity: grave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get -yf install gcc-3.0-sparc64 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 packages not fully installed

Bug#99038: marked as done ([PR java/3490] internal error using static synchronized)

2001-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:14:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 3.0.1-0pre010801 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi