Please do another gcc-3.0 upload (was: Re: katie change: source versions must be newer than existing versions)

2001-07-28 Thread Matthias Klose
James Troup writes: > James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This had to be done since jenna does removals based on version > > numbers and if someone (say, doko@ ;-) uploaded a source package > > with an older version than previously existed, it would be > > auto-deleted in favour of

Bug#106927: cc1: Internal error: Segmentation fault

2001-07-28 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-4 Hi, On Debian/Unstable on Alpha Doing: gcc-3.0 -v --help ends with: -O[number] Set optimisation level to [number] -Os Optimise for space rather than speed cc1: Internal error: Segmentat

Bug#106538: marked as done (version numbering broken)

2001-07-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2001 14:57:21 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#106538: fixed in gcc-3.0 1:3.0.1ds0-0pre010727 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

gcc-3.0 override disparity

2001-07-28 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): libstdc++3_3.0.1-0pre010727_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and th

gcc-3.0_3.0.1ds0-0pre010727_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-07-28 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: g77-3.0-doc_3.0.1-0pre010727_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/g77-3.0-doc_3.0.1-0pre010727_all.deb gcc-3.0_3.0.1ds0-0pre010727.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0_3.0.1ds0-0pre010727.dsc gcc-3.0-doc_3.0.1-0pre010727_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0-doc_3.0.1-0pre010727_all.deb

Please do another gcc-3.0 upload (was: Re: katie change: source versions must be newer than existing versions)

2001-07-28 Thread James Troup
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This had to be done since jenna does removals based on version > numbers and if someone (say, doko@ ;-) uploaded a source package > with an older version than previously existed, it would be > auto-deleted in favour of the existent older-but-newer-by-versi

katie change: source versions must be newer than existing versions

2001-07-28 Thread James Troup
Moin, FYI katie has been changed to check source versions just like it already does for binary versions, i.e. every source upload must have a newer version than the ones currently in the target suite(s). This had to be done since jenna does removals based on version numbers and if someone (say, d