Bug#106716: gcc-3.0.1 refuses to compile Linux kernel

2001-07-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:07:20PM +0100, David Starner wrote: > From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > > Package: gcc-3.0 > > > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723 > > > > > > Hi, > > > gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable defau

Bug#106538: version numbering broken

2001-07-26 Thread Cesar Eduardo Barros
Not to mention it means it'll never end up in testing... -- Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#106716: gcc-3.0.1 refuses to compile Linux kernel

2001-07-26 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > Why not have the kernel Makefile pass "-flimit-inline=1" explicitly? > > Because of I see no reason for breaking documented behavior - also my He's got a point here. The documentation says that the inlining limit default is 1. I'll have t

Bug#106716: gcc-3.0.1 refuses to compile Linux kernel

2001-07-26 Thread David Starner
From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > Package: gcc-3.0 > > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723 > > > > Hi, > > gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable default for -flimit-inline - > > probably something around 100, but I did not look

Bug#106716: gcc-3.0.1 refuses to compile Linux kernel

2001-07-26 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 26 Jul 01 at 16:11, Ben Collins wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > Package: gcc-3.0 > > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723 > > to change code to not inline, and I agree with him - 100 is completely > > stupid, backward incompatible limit. Even rebuilding kernel

Bug#106716: gcc-3.0.1 refuses to compile Linux kernel

2001-07-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > Package: gcc-3.0 > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723 > > Hi, > gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable default for -flimit-inline - > probably something around 100, but I did not look at sources. Default is > documented to be 1 -

Bug#106716: gcc-3.0.1 refuses to compile Linux kernel

2001-07-26 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723 Hi, gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable default for -flimit-inline - probably something around 100, but I did not look at sources. Default is documented to be 1 - 100 times larger than current default is. Is there some really good reason for

Re: c++/3827: new int problem.

2001-07-26 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | template< typename T, int role, bool ndebug > | struct init { | static T * do_it() { | T* tmp(new T); | std::cout << "/tmp/ point to: " << *tmp << "\n"; | return tmp; | } | }; | /tmp/ point to: 0 | /tmp/ point to: 107