Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> you write that "apparently", g++ 3.0 tries a longer conversion chain
> than 2.95. Indeed, the compiler message let us think so. But to
> verify this, I added traces into your testcase. The result is that
> both g++ versions use the same con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 105384 binutils
Bug#105384: Segfault involving templates, std::string, and exceptions
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.0' to `binutils'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administra
reassign 105384 binutils
thanks
That's the assembler crashing
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:22:25PM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
> Package: g++-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Consider the attached source file. When trying to compile this, I get:
>
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++-
>It's used as a noun, but the same rules do not apply, atleast from what
>I remember from the english textbooks.
Oh. Maybe this is specific to American English; I don't think British English
treats acronyms or initialisms specially.
p.
pgpgcL66IFau0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:21:17PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >No, we aren't talking about nouns, we are talking about acronyms. The above
> >does not pertain to this use.
>
> An acronym is still a noun. (And "80s" isn't an acroynm, anyway.)
It's used as a noun, but the same rules do not ap
>No, we aren't talking about nouns, we are talking about acronyms. The above
>does not pertain to this use.
An acronym is still a noun. (And "80s" isn't an acroynm, anyway.)
p.
pgpU4M3HJgHOm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:38:42PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >IMO, this is incorrect. The ('s) is always used for showing plural and
> >possesive on things like "API's" or "80's". It just doesn't make sense
> >without it.
> >
> >Then again, I never cared much for the language part of english
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-4
Severity: normal
Consider the attached source file. When trying to compile this, I get:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++-3.0 -O -c segfault.cc
| g++-3.0: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as)
| Please submit a full bug report.
| See http://www.gnu.org/softwar
>IMO, this is incorrect. The ('s) is always used for showing plural and
>possesive on things like "API's" or "80's". It just doesn't make sense
>without it.
>
>Then again, I never cared much for the language part of english class :)
No, James is right. This is the infamous grocers' apostrophe; Fo
>Submitter-Id: ?
>Originator:Franck Branjonneau
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: GCC gives an ICE instead of reporting an error.
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: ?
>Category: c++
>Class: ice-on-illegal-code
>Release: 3.0 (Debian) (Debian
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 11:16:41AM -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403
> Severity: wishlist
> sonames:
> - Rename all shared libraries names. If the library API's are changed
> + Rename all shared libraries names. If the library APIs are changed
>
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403
Severity: wishlist
I suggest these grammar and spelling fixes. Note that "it's" is always
a contraction standing for "it is". The possessive form is "its".
Isn't English great? :-)
- Jim Van Zandt
--- README.Debian-orig Sun Jul 15 11
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010427
Severity: wishlist
Here's another segment that needs to have an assembler optimiser run over it:
int foo(char c) {
if (c && !(c & 0x80)) {
a();
} else {
b();
}
}
produces with -O2:
0: 55
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 103980 normal
Bug#103980: g++-3.0: copies constructors
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
14 matches
Mail list logo
