gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds3-0.010629_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds3-0.010629.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds3-0.010629.diff.gz g77-2.95-doc_2.95.4-0.010629_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95-doc_2.95.4-0.010629_all.deb cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-0.010629_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-0.0

Processed: reassign gcc bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 61806 g++-2.95 Bug#61806: [PR114] __attribute__ ((constructor)) doesn't work with C++ Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. > retitle 61806 [fixed in g++-3.0] [PR114] __attribute__ ((constructor)) > doesn't work with C++ Bug#61806:

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 75773 wishlist Bug#75773: gcc: appalling optimisation with sub/cmp on i386 Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: tagging gcc reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 81338 wontfix Bug#81338: gcc272: gcc29166 Bug#74426: wishlist: add package for egcs/Alpha as an alternative Tags added: wontfix > tags 74426 wontfix Bug#74426: wishlist: add package for egcs/Alpha as an alternative Bug#81338: gcc272: gcc29166 Tags

Re: closing reports requesting egcs1.1?

>should these reports closed? You mean #81338? I'd just tag it "wontfix". p. pgp5OOjaUih0G.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: fixed g++ bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 50529 [fixed in g++-3.0] volatile undefined... Bug#50529: [fixed upstream 001117] volatile undefined... Changed Bug title. > reassign 50529 g++-2.95 Bug#50529: [fixed in g++-3.0] volatile undefined... Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2

closing reports requesting egcs1.1?

should these reports closed?

Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though)

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Internal compiler error (with wrong code, though) >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: c++ >Class: ice-on-illegal-code

Processed: forarded gcj bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 94974 [PR java/2959] gcj-3.0 does not know that interface members are > public by default Bug#94974: gcj-3.0 does not know that interface members are public by default Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: retitle objc bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 80468 [PR objc/2824] @protocol forward declarations don't work Bug#80468: [PR1086] @protocol forward declarations don't work Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (admini

Bug#90143: marked as done (source parallelisation suggestion)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:14:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line source parallelisation suggestion has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#102451: marked as done (libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:09:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#102451: libgcj0-dev doesn't create required docs symlink has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#102473: include_next does not work correctly in std_cstdio.h (and others)

Christof Petig writes: > Package: libstdc++3-dev > Version: 3.0-2 > Platform: ppc > > If I compile a program which includes any of the following headers: > cassert, cctype, cerrno, clocale (and others) > I get the following errors: > /usr/include/g++-v3/bits/std_cstring.h:40:25: string.h:

Bug#100722: redundant error message from cpp

Cesar Eduardo Barros writes: > that: > > - what's :29:36: and :61:62: ? Why two numbers? line and column number

-fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Patrik Hagglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: -fno-bounds-check in combination with -W gives strange message >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: java >Class: sw-bu

internal error using static synchronized

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Patrik Hagglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: internal error using static synchronized >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: java >Class: ice-on-legal-code >Release:

request for a customer id

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Matthias Klose >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: >Priority: >Category: send-pr >Class: >Release: 3.0 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable) >Environment: System: Linux gate.local 2.4.4-ac15 #1 Fri May 25 00:52

unrecognized token before #include points to wrong source

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Jim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: unrecognized token before #include points to wrong source >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: preprocessor >Class: sw-bug >R

Processed: reassign g++ bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 88260 g++-2.95 Bug#88260: No warning for missing return in non-void member func Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. > retitle 88260 [fixed in g++-3.0] No warning for missing return in non-void > member func Bug#88260: No warning