Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
according to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known, it would seem to be a good
idea to compile g++-3.0 with the --use-cxa-atexit switch:
>Global destructors are not run in the correct order
>Global destructors should be run in the reverse ord
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias>
Matthias> ok, please attach the GCC GNATS number to the Debian report.
Here it is :
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `optimization/3315'.
The individual assigned to look at yo
On Friday 22 June 2001 01:23, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:44:36AM -0400, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > I meant only to suggest you reopen it. I didn't want to do it.
> > That is your job. I am sorry about that.
> > If what you say truly makes sense then you better tell t
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 0.8
Severity: serious
Hi. We are replacing the hackish 'gnupro' toolchain package for ia64 with
properly crafted 2.96 packages as defaults, and 3.0 available as an option.
Please change the gcc-defaults package to use 2.96 as the default for ia64.
I'm making this b
4 matches
Mail list logo