here's the full build log of the failed build
--
Ryan Murray, Debian Developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The opinions expressed here are my own.
mips-gcc.log.bz2
Description: Binary data
pgpR6EYIWEHi9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
type... mips-mips-linux-gnu
checking build system type... mips-mips-linux-gnu
This version fails to build. I've attached the build log:
Automatic build of gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds2-0.010522 on reconfig.rfc822.org by
sbuild 1.153
Build started at 20010527-2012
checking build system type... mips-un
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:06 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds2-0.010522)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:27 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:27 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:27 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 93929 + fixed
Bug#93929: chill has description of objective-c
Tags added: fixed
> tag 96272 + fixed
Bug#96272: Typo in Suggests?
Tags added: fixed
> tag 96273 + fixed
Bug#96273: Typo in Suggests
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Installing:
gcc-3.0-base_3.0-0pre010526_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0-base_3.0-0pre010526_all.deb
libgcc0_3.0-0pre010526_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/libgcc0_3.0-0pre010526_i386.deb
libgcj2_3.0-0pre010526_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/libgcj2_3.0-0pre010526_i386.deb
gcc-3.0_3.0
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libstdc++3_3.0-0pre010525_i386.deb: priority is overridden from required to
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Installing:
libffi2_3.0-0pre010525_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/libffi2_3.0-0pre010525_i386.deb
gcc-3.0_3.0.ds6-0pre010525.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0_3.0.ds6-0pre010525.diff.gz
g77-3.0_3.0-0pre010525_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.0/g77-3.0_3.0-0pre010525_i386.deb
libstdc++3-db
Installing:
protoize-2.95_2.95.4-0.010522_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/protoize-2.95_2.95.4-0.010522_i386.deb
gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds2.orig.tar.gz
g77-2.95_2.95.4-0.010522_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/g77-2.95_2.95.4-0.010522_i386.de
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.2_2.95.4-0.010522_i386.deb: priority is overridden from
extra to optional.
chill-2.95_2.95.4-0.010522_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to
extra.
Eithe
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libstdc++3_3.0-0pre010526_i386.deb: priority is overridden from required to
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Installing:
gcc_2.95.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_2.95.4-1_i386.deb
gcj_3.0-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcj_3.0-3_i386.deb
cpp_2.95.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_2.95.4-1_i386.deb
g++_2.95.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_2.95.4-1_i386.
tag 93929 + fixed
tag 96272 + fixed
tag 96273 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 02:25:45 +0200
Source: gcc-defaults
Binary: gcj g77 gpc g
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
chill_2.95.4-1_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong p
31 matches
Mail list logo
