severity 96539 normal
retitle 96539 [fixed in 3.0] libstdc++2.10-dev: Error in bastring.h
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: libstdc++2.10-dev
> Version: 1:2.95.2-14
> Severity: important
wide strings don't work in 2.95.x. See the thread starting at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-12/m
Your message dated Sun, 6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010506
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010506
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010506
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010506
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010506
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 96539 normal
Bug#96539: libstdc++2.10-dev: Error in bastring.h
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 96539 [fixed in 3.0] libstdc++2.10-dev: Error in bastring.h
Bug#96539: libstdc++2.10-dev: Error in bastring.h
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopp
Installing:
gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010506_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010506_i386.deb
gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010506_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/gobjc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010506_i386.deb
libg++2.8.1.3-dev_2.95.4-0.010506_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/libg++2.8.1.3-dev_2.95.4-
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libg++2.8.1.3-glibc2.2_2.95.4-0.010506_i386.deb: priority is overridden from
extra to optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correc
Matthias,
The new gcc-2.95.4 package builds fine on debian ppc woody.
Also I am able to now build glibc 2.2.3-1 using the resulting
gcc 2.95.4.
Jack
Your message dated Sun, 6 May 2001 20:13:36 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in libreadline4-dev-4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libstdc++2.10-dev
Version: 1:2.95.2-14
Severity: important
In bastring.h:
const charT* c_str () const
{ const charT* null_str = "";
if (length () == 0) return null_str; terminate (); return data (); }
The second line will _fail_ if charT is not char, which it for instance
i
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:36:55PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Those names are used -because- dpkg-architecture uses the same names.
> >
> > More likely this is going wrong:
> > ifneq ($(TARGET),native)
> > DEB_HOST_ARCH = $(TARGET)
> > endif
> >
> > I see at least two problems:
> >
Matthias Klose writes:
> in the changelog you wrote
> > * Apparently we do have a problem with dpkg-dev-1.9, which does
> >create control files with missing 'Architecture:' lines. Fixes
> >are welcome.
>
> The following patch fixes the problem for a native build,
> but will probabl
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:50:35PM -0400, Gray Carper wrote:
> > Package: gcc-2.95
> > Version: 2.95.4.ds1-0.010424
> >
> > In truth, this applies to all gcc-2.95 versions.
> >
> > When building the gcc-2.95 package, four key dpkg-dev
> > variables are utilized
I missed to forward this message ...
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
in the changelog you wrote
> * Apparently we do have a problem with dpkg-dev-1.9, which does
>create control files with missing 'Architecture:' lines. Fixes
>are welcome.
The following patch fixes the problem for a native bui
16 matches
Mail list logo
