Re: Printerspooler

2002-05-17 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Drop all printerspooler except cups? >> Or do we want to have lpr, lprng and cups? > In doubt, drop lpr since lprng is a complete replacement. I am not sure > about CUPS, there are still many people prefering the clasic solution. lpr dropped. BTW: Do y

Re: Printerspooler

2002-05-17 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Joerg Jaspert wrote on Fri May 17, 2002 um 09:50:17PM: > Drop all printerspooler except cups? > Or do we want to have lpr, lprng and cups? In doubt, drop lpr since lprng is a complete replacement. I am not sure about CUPS, there are still many people prefering the clasic solution. Grus