Booth planning

2003-06-15 Thread hauke
Hi, for the Linux day @ LinuxTag I can bring along: - 2x 24 port 100mBit Switches - 2x inflatable rubber penguins (with a little SuSE logo on it. but I think it can be hidden easily) - different calbles (network, power) It is possible that I bring along a server and a client for showing our Debi

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-21 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:32:51AM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote: > And _this_ is the way to go: going out of the booth tracking down > people looking a bit confused, even if they wear a suit :) It really Yes. > debian and what we consider as free software... But I believe that the > strength of De

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-21 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 10:41:04PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > Hm, where did Michael talk about the T-Shirts? He talked about the image > of the booth that you got from walking past it. Yes, I just accepted the idea of wearing the T-shirts. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go S

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-21 Thread Thimo Neubauer
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:12:31PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > But think about it, if everyone's wearing the same T-Shirt it's very easy to > see who is doing booth duty. This makes it much easier for visitors. Well, IIRC last time every helping person in the Debian booth wore either the bottle

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-06-20 Joost van Baal wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: > > > > But that does not mean it should represent itself that way. > > > > Sure, there is no company named Debian, but why not loo

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-06-20 Alexander Reelsen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:27:19PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: > > > I didn't mean that literally. Sorry for being unclear. What do you mean > > > by 'looking more professional'? Wearing t

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-20 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-06-20 "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote: > > "Christian" == Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [SNIP] > Christian> This way the booth would have a professional look to > Christian> impress and convince people about debian, instead of > Christian> giving the impression of hack

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:20:46PM +0200, Alexander Reelsen wrote: > Are you serious? This is gonna be a Open Source/Free Software pavillon Yes, in that I say it's a good idea. > (choose whatever you like) booth and not Uncle Sam's army show... :) Na, I don't think it would be a good idea to fo

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Alexander Reelsen
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:27:19PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: > > I didn't mean that literally. Sorry for being unclear. What do you mean > > by 'looking more professional'? Wearing the same Debian Tshirts maybe? > For instance

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: > I didn't mean that literally. Sorry for being unclear. What do you mean > by 'looking more professional'? Wearing the same Debian Tshirts maybe? For instance that would be a good idea. > I believe the fact that Debian booth peo

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Joost van Baal
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: > > > But that does not mean it should represent itself that way. Sure, there is > > > no company named Debian, but why not looking more professional? > > Which did not

Re: "professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: > > But that does not mean it should represent itself that way. Sure, there is > > no company named Debian, but why not looking more professional? Which did not mean wearing a suit! > If I were to appear in a suit to be on a debian b

"professional" debian booths (was: Re: booth planning LinuxTag)

2001-06-20 Thread Joost van Baal
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 08:19:53AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:29:10AM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote: > > Debian is *not* a company (even if some people have vested business > > interests, and thus (consciously or not) want Debian to look > > "professional" (whatever

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-20 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:29:10AM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote: > Debian is *not* a company (even if some people have vested business > interests, and thus (consciously or not) want Debian to look > "professional" (whatever that is)) > > Debian *is* a hacker community, at least from my POV. B

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-19 Thread "Jürgen A. Erhard"
> "Christian" == Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [SNIP] Christian> This way the booth would have a professional look to Christian> impress and convince people about debian, instead of Christian> giving the impression of hacker meeting. This brings up the questions we s

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-19 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Christian Kurz wrote on Mon Jun 18, 2001 um 10:34:31PM: > Booth pictures: > > ________ > | _ __ | > | | 2 | | 3 | | > x || |_| x > x x >

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-18 Thread Christian Kurz
On 01-06-17 Martin Schulze wrote: > I'm quite frustrated about the non-existant booth planning for > LinuxTag. Well, since I wasn't sure if I find some time to come to the LinuxTag, I haven't done any kind of planning. Since I know currently for sure, that I will have some

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-17 Thread H.Heinold
Hi joey, as you know I will be in stuttgart the weekend before the LT and I have some experienece on installing debian on alpha, becuase I set up the XP1000 at my former university. Thast why I would like to install the alpha machine. -- Henning Heinold

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-17 Thread Martin Schulze
Jens-Dietrich Neppe wrote: > > > I'm quite frustrated about the non-existant booth planning for > > LinuxTag. > > > > Nobody stepped forward to tell me that he wants to install the loaned > > machines. Nobody with experience for alpha and sparc boxes. A

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-17 Thread Jens-Dietrich Neppe
> I'm quite frustrated about the non-existant booth planning for > LinuxTag. > > Nobody stepped forward to tell me that he wants to install the loaned > machines. Nobody with experience for alpha and sparc boxes. A couple > of people told me that they could be around o

Re: booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-17 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
Martin Schulze wrote: > Nobody with experience for alpha and sparc boxes. A couple > of people told me that they could be around on wednesday but have no > experience for these architectures. Maybe I should just cancel this. Unfortunately, I am only arriving on Thursday. I have a little experien

booth planning LinuxTag

2001-06-17 Thread Martin Schulze
I'm quite frustrated about the non-existant booth planning for LinuxTag. Nobody stepped forward to tell me that he wants to install the loaned machines. Nobody with experience for alpha and sparc boxes. A couple of people told me that they could be around on wednesday but have no experienc