Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-06 Thread Maximilian Wilhelm
Am Donnerstag, den 5. Januar hub Simon Richter folgendes in die Tasten: Hi! > > how could someone think i could find eroticism *here*? > Hrm, Sauna in Helsinki anyone? I kind of miss it ;-) SCNR Max -- | | Follow the white penguin. | |\/| | |-

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Joerg Stephan
Its nice to see so many people talking about one misplaced email... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Stefan Luetkebrune wrote: > maybe an attempt to verify email adresses > for spam purposes, but *via* an infested pc > > I've found mails with that subject in my > junk and virus filters for several years now. Maybe we can take this thread to debian-curios

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Stefan Luetkebrune
maybe an attempt to verify email adresses for spam purposes, but *via* an infested pc I've found mails with that subject in my junk and virus filters for several years now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Florian Weimer
* Michael Dominok: >> Rather unlikely. He's either genuinely interested in this kind of >> stuff (and we probably should remove his posting), or he's fighting >> pornography on the network, and tries to encourage others to offer >> pornography to him so he can take legal action against them (or >

[ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Dominok
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 13:50 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * martin f. krafft: > > > uh, it was probably a worm on that guy's machine. I wonder why > > people even react to this stuff. > > Rather unlikely. He's either genuinely interested in this kind of > stuff (and we probably should remove hi

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.05.1350 +0100]: > Rather unlikely. He's either genuinely interested in this kind of > stuff (and we probably should remove his posting), or he's fighting > pornography on the network, and tries to encourage others to offer > pornography to hi

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Axel Beckert
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:36:20PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Florian Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.05.1315 +0100]: > > how could someone think i could find eroticism *here*? > > uh, it was probably a worm on that guy's machine. No. This was perhaps the reply on a worm's ma

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Florian Weimer
* martin f. krafft: > uh, it was probably a worm on that guy's machine. I wonder why > people even react to this stuff. Rather unlikely. He's either genuinely interested in this kind of stuff (and we probably should remove his posting), or he's fighting pornography on the network, and tries to e

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Florian Ludwig wrote: Bitte sagt mir, ob man hier bei Euch Erotik sehen und hören kann. Nein, zumindest bei Debian nicht. It's an egnlish ml, isn't it? Mostly, indeed. We should probably remove the offending posts from the archive nevertheless, as lists.debian.org is likely to h

Re: [ot] Re: vollgespritzte Fotzen

2006-01-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Florian Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.05.1315 +0100]: > how could someone think i could find eroticism *here*? uh, it was probably a worm on that guy's machine. I wonder why people even react to this stuff. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .'