Re: status update LT 2003 CD

2003-04-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 05:11:38PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > Ok now for some questions: > > Should we include a modified sources.list containing unoffical sources with > > a big fat warning or as an alternativ a second source list with unoffical > > stuff? sources

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

2003-04-12 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Joerg Wendland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> No. However, as a compromise you could place a sources.list.addons in >> /etc/apt/ and tell people about it. We could also spend a paragraph >> in the README or index.html to link against apt-get.org so people can >> search for packages there as well

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

2003-04-12 Thread Joerg Wendland
Martin Schulze, on 2003-04-12, 17:11, you wrote: > No. However, as a compromise you could place a sources.list.addons in > /etc/apt/ and tell people about it. We could also spend a paragraph > in the README or index.html to link against apt-get.org so people can > search for packages there as wel

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

2003-04-12 Thread Martin Schulze
Sven Hoexter wrote: > Ok now for some questions: > Should we include a modified sources.list containing unoffical sources with > a big fat warning or as an alternativ a second source list with unoffical > stuff? sourceslist.d would be great but the apt in woody doesn't support this > so it's not a