On 01-06-20 Joost van Baal wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > > But that does not mean it should represent itself that way.
> > > > Sure, there is no company named Debian, but why not loo
On 01-06-20 Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:27:19PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > I didn't mean that literally. Sorry for being unclear. What do you mean
> > > by 'looking more professional'? Wearing t
On 01-06-20 "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote:
> > "Christian" == Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [SNIP]
> Christian> This way the booth would have a professional look to
> Christian> impress and convince people about debian, instead of
> Christian> giving the impression of hack
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:22:39PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:31:33PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
>
> > mit einen allgemeinen Update tue ich mich sehr schwer. Sind das
> > wirklich Sachen, die ein User bemerkt?!
>
> Schlechter wird die Qualitaet dadurch sicher nicht
#include
Michael Bramer wrote on Wed Jun 20, 2001 um 03:06:50PM:
> > Blackdown-Java installiert ist, weil der CLASSPATH erweitert werden
> > muss. Ich habe es schon gemeldet, die nächste Version ist hoffentlich
> > korrekt. Wenn du es dringend brauchst, kann ich die Version mit
> > Korrektur neuv
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:20:46PM +0200, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> Are you serious? This is gonna be a Open Source/Free Software pavillon
Yes, in that I say it's a good idea.
> (choose whatever you like) booth and not Uncle Sam's army show... :)
Na, I don't think it would be a good idea to fo
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:31:33PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> mit einen allgemeinen Update tue ich mich sehr schwer. Sind das
> wirklich Sachen, die ein User bemerkt?!
Schlechter wird die Qualitaet dadurch sicher nicht, im Gegenteil gerade
bei der glibc wurden einige Fehler von -1 bis -5 beh
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:27:19PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > I didn't mean that literally. Sorry for being unclear. What do you mean
> > by 'looking more professional'? Wearing the same Debian Tshirts maybe?
> For instance
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> I didn't mean that literally. Sorry for being unclear. What do you mean
> by 'looking more professional'? Wearing the same Debian Tshirts maybe?
For instance that would be a good idea.
> I believe the fact that Debian booth peo
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Michael Bramer wrote on Wed Jun 20, 2001 um 02:44:53PM:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > > debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/m/mozilla/mozilla*0.9.1*deb
> > > >
> > > > with this, mozill
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:47:06PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Michael Bramer wrote on Wed Jun 20, 2001 um 02:23:32PM:
> > > Could you also consider including ISDN packages on the CD and updating
> >
> > add isdnutils
>
> Don't forget "ipppd". It was splitted from the isdnutils packa
#include
Michael Bramer wrote on Wed Jun 20, 2001 um 02:44:53PM:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/m/mozilla/mozilla*0.9.1*deb
> > >
> > > with this, mozilla is the fourth sid-'package' on the CD.
> >
> > Please don't take them.
#include
Michael Bramer wrote on Wed Jun 20, 2001 um 02:23:32PM:
> > Could you also consider including ISDN packages on the CD and updating
>
> add isdnutils
Don't forget "ipppd". It was splitted from the isdnutils package, but is
needed by most people ;)
> - on CD is a exim with this bug (but
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/m/mozilla/mozilla*0.9.1*deb
> >
> > with this, mozilla is the fourth sid-'package' on the CD.
>
> Please don't take them. This packages does not support https (even if they
> are located in non-US) a
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:18:04PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:55:50PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > Überprüfe doch bitte alles nochmal und sende mir E-Mails zurück. Danke
> > Ich habe z.B. nicht das BTS abgefragt etc.
>
> Mach ich heute abend, ich kann das hier an m
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:58:01AM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Michael Bramer wrote:
>
> Could you also consider including ISDN packages on the CD and updating
add isdnutils
> packages with recent security advisories (exim, man-db)? And maybe
> update Samba to 2.2.0 (all RC-bugs don't affect us
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 12:22:24PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> To grisu: IMHO these version is useable, you make take it for the CD.
> For Windows user, we should create a HTML file that will be opened
> automaticaly via autorun.inf - with links to this README,
> installation manual, other FAQs (i
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:31:39PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Eduard Bloch wrote on Thu Jun 14, 2001 um 09:18:29AM:
>
> > I am going to rewrite the README from the last year(german). There would
> > be following sections:
> > - Disclaimer, some words about sponsors
> > - Hints how to setup this
Hallo
ok, ich habe jetzt mir einfach mal Zeit genommen und die CD fertig zu
bekommen.
Überprüfe doch bitte alles nochmal und sende mir E-Mails zurück. Danke
Ich habe z.B. nicht das BTS abgefragt etc.
btw: Morgen muß die CD fertig sein und ich habe morgen fast keine
Zeot...
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001
Yesterday I decided to go to the LinuxTag and supply some Hardware to
the booth.
I´ll take the following stuff with me:
* Old (and loud) Apple Quadra 950 (m68040, 40Mhz)
* Not that old PowerMac 8200 (ppc601, 120 Mhz)
* ia32 with TV Card
* 19" Monitor.
* (Maybe an old DECstation fro
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > But that does not mean it should represent itself that way. Sure, there is
> > > no company named Debian, but why not looking more professional?
>
> Which did not
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > But that does not mean it should represent itself that way. Sure, there is
> > no company named Debian, but why not looking more professional?
Which did not mean wearing a suit!
> If I were to appear in a suit to be on a debian b
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 08:19:53AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:29:10AM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote:
> > Debian is *not* a company (even if some people have vested business
> > interests, and thus (consciously or not) want Debian to look
> > "professional" (whatever
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:29:10AM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote:
> Debian is *not* a company (even if some people have vested business
> interests, and thus (consciously or not) want Debian to look
> "professional" (whatever that is))
>
> Debian *is* a hacker community, at least from my POV.
B
24 matches
Mail list logo
