se of
their liking to any packaging work I ever did in the Debian project or to claim
copyright for my work or to not mention my contribution at all.
[1] https://blog.koch.ro/posts/2023-03-15-debian-exclusion.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/02/msg00023.html
Thomas Koch
&g
I think I believe how to fix the FTBFS:
--- a/debian/patches/0005-configure-mkdocs-for-Debian.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/0005-configure-mkdocs-for-Debian.patch
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ index 1302441..05ada85 100644
+site_dir: html
copyright: "Copyright (C) 2011-2020 Bozhidar Batsov and Projectile
con
Source: emacs
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: tho...@koch.ro, debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Posting this as a bug against the emacs source package in lack of a better
place.
Trying to git clone the emacs repository from salsa fails:
% git clone
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, tho...@koch.ro,
debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lsp-treemacs
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Ivan Yonchovski
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, tho...@koch.ro,
debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: emacs-request
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : Takafumi Arakaki
I wanted to upload a new version of rust-mode and I'm not sure how to deal with
the master branch. It's simplified latest history is:
Merge branch 'mr_0.3.0-3' into 'master'
debian/0.4.0-1 (only ever uploaded to experimental)
debian/0.3.0-2
It seems that dgit was used so far with this repository
I've disabled the failing test in version 17.2-2
Does anybody have an idea why we see so many emacs packages being marked for
autoremoval due to FTBFS on November 5th? Is there a common source? Is anybody
looking into it? Or do we need to look into each individual package?
Thank you, Thomas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
* Package name: git-auto-commit-mode
Version : 4.7.0
Upstream Author : Tom Willemse
* URL : https://github.com/ryuslash/git-auto-commit
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianEmacsenTeam/Tips
I found the above site yesterday and now added two things that I learned. You
should subscribe to changes for this site!
The headlines of my additions:
= Workaround for cut backtrace output lines =
= Exclude ERT tests =
Package: emacs
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
Thank you! Any help needed?
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/emacs/news/NEWS.27.1
Package: elpa-rust-mode
Version 0.4.0 has been uploaded to experimental in March 2019. Is there any
reason not to upload it to unstable? Would you mind if I did it?
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: tho...@koch.ro, debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org, Phillip Lord
org-drill was bundled as contrib in org-mode but needed an update and a new
maintainer.
It has now a new maintainer
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2019-06/msg00191.html
is on melpa
https:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
X-Debbugs-Cc: tho...@koch.ro, debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: company-lsp
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Caibin Chen
* URL
https://github.com/magnars/dash.el/releases
I want to update lsp-mode to 6.0 but it relies on dash-el >= 2.15.0 which was
released only yesterday.
Do you think it's feasible to update dash-el (and dash-functional) in the next
days? Would you like me to do it? Do you think it's dangerous to have
Hi,
I'm working on lsp-haskell which depends on haskell-mode. I'd like to upload a
new debian version of haskell-mode to:
- move the packaging to salsa
- rename the package to elpa-haskell-mode (with a dummy haskell-mode package)
- conform to the elpa-* packaging standards, so that lsp-haskell c
I'm working on elpa-lsp-mode. It requires emacs 25.
When I try the package on my Debian stable, it fails byte-compilation for emacs
24. After removing emacs 24 it installs just fine with only emacs 25 installed.
Is there a way to specify that a package should only be installed for a subset
of th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: elpa-lsp-mode
Version : 4.2
Upstream Author : Alan Zimmerman, Vibhav Pant , Sebastien
Chapuis
* URL : https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-mode
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: elpa-lsp-ui
Version : 20180619.251
Upstream Author : Sebastien Chapuis , Tobias Pisani
* URL : https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-ui
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: elpa-lsp-haskell
Version : 20180806.631
Upstream Author : Alan Zimmerman, Vibhav Pant
* URL : https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-haskell
* License
? Would it make sense to get this package team maintained? Can the
maintainers be convinced to use git instead of CVS (sic!)?
Regards, Thomas Koch
Hi,
the emacs people thought that it might be useful to have a PET instance. Where
can we find informations on how to setup such a thing?
Thank you,
Thomas Koch
The following notes are probably totally incorrect and in no way
authoritative.
** conclusions
- melpa does not use the packages versions but timestamps. That breaks
dependencies?
We don't consider melpa as a useful metadata source.
** easy decisions
- prefix: elpa- at least for those packa
On Sunday 16 August 2015 21:41:39 David Bremner wrote:
> We have booked the Athen room from 10-12 for the debian emacs addons
> packaging sprint. Depending on the morning talks I'll be there for an
> hour or so out of this time. If you're interested in the state of emacs
> addons in Debian, or in s
Has anybody tried spacemacs?
https://github.com/syl20bnr/spacemacs
Is it good? Would it make sense to try to package it?
Actually it's a collection of the best emacs modes with an opinionated config,
isn't it?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-emacsen-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sunday, February 09, 2014 11:22:09 AM Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just read the emacs policy (from stable, which is outdated) because
> I'd like to have a few modes packaged and found this discussion.
>
> Please tell me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't e
lved once in emacsen-
common and packaging an emacs mode wouldn't be more complicate than to figure
out the correct debian/copyright.
Regards, Thomas Koch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-emacsen-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Hi,
is there any hope that we could see an emacs24 backport? What emacs do you
use? I'm on stable+backports and I need a reliable emacs, so emacs-snapshot is
no option since it moves too fast. (Besides it's unmaintained now?)
Thank you,
Thomas Koch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
28 matches
Mail list logo
