.config for 2.4.27-ltsp-2 ?

Hi, In stable the .config for the included kernel for the thin clients was included in the docs, it doesn't seem to be present in pr04 for bzImage-2.4.26-ltsp-2 - is the .config available? Thanks, Jim

2.6 based clients with sound on pr05 (documented)

Hi, I've been working for a while on getting pr05 (and afew other releases previously) working on some new Dell Optiplex 170t's to go into some small schools here in the UK. I had trouble with hardware support so got the clients using the 2.6 based kernel and modules, its all pretty much working

Re: 2.6 based clients with sound on pr05 (documented)

On 8/19/05, Kurt Gramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we need more schools in UK, dont forget to put it into our > database ;-) > > http://www.skolelinux.org/no/user_experience/test_schools/test_schools_add > We should hopefully going ahead with the installations soon, so I'll add them as soon as

esd - only first user gets sound

Hi, I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before, I couldn't find it in the archives but I'm sure I read something about it. The problem I'm having is on the thin clients I've setup (using the 2.6.9-ltsp-3 kernel), the first user (say, user01) logs in and gets sound from the server without a p

Changing user name generation

Hi, I've been playing with Skole a reasonable amount recent, and have put it into afew small schools near where I am, one of the biggest problems we're having is the username generation - although the add ldap user script works well, for the schools I've put Skole into, it generates really ba

Re: Changing user name generation (SOLVED)

Thanks for the replies chaps, Christian Kuelker wrote: I use therefore a different user administration, called CipUX/CAT. This will import lists, where you can choose the login name, or you can chose a name when you create a user. This tool you may test only for new servers. Skolelinux Sarge

Re: replacement for NFS ?

On 3/21/06, Alexander Schremmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:21:28 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > Personally I favor OpenAFS due to its more MacOS (classic) like access > > rules logic and support for flexible distributed storage pools. NFSv4 > > may be more interest