Hi Petter, hi Andi,
On So 09 Jan 2011 22:40:18 CET Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Part of the reason we went with powerdns is that it fetches
information directly from LDAP, so changes done to LDAP take effect
imediately. A reason we moved the DNS from files to LDAP is to allow
dynamic updates of
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:31:16AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Andi,
On Fr 07 Jan 2011 10:41:41 CET "Andreas B. Mundt" wrote:
Take a look at
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-edu/trunk/src/debian-edu-config/cf/cf.homes>,
i.e. our exports file. If a machine want's to mount the home
director
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09. jan. 2011 22:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Andreas B. Mundt]
>> So I conclude, that the current DNS setup, as a mixture of ldap
>> objects prepared for bind with extra attributes to make powerDNS
>> (sort of) work, is broken.
>
> It is not
Hi Petter,
I don't want to discuss the technical points, but:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Andreas B. Mundt]
> > So I conclude, that the current DNS setup, as a mixture of ldap
> > objects prepared for bind with extra attributes to make powerDNS
> > (so
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bug tracking system
(http://bugs.skolelinux.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW or REOPENED state, and have not been
touched in 7 days or more.
You need to take a
5 matches
Mail list logo