Hi,
On Mo 10 Mai 2021 01:03:47 CEST, Russell Stuart wrote:
On 9/5/21 6:08 am, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Furthermore, I agree with Nik, that AGPL for a non-web project (as
that's where AGPL really makes sense) is disputable and you don't
loose anything if you switch over to GPL-3+ instead of AGPL
On 9/5/21 6:08 am, Mike Gabriel wrote:
That is not the point. E.g., if we spot a security issue with a
package, maybe you as the maintainer / upstream developer (afaik, you
are upstream and downstream for pam-python, Russel, right?) but also
maybe someone in the security team (or any other third
Hi Russel,
On Do 06 Mai 2021 12:21:28 CEST, Russell Stuart wrote:
On 6/5/21 12:55 am, Dominik George wrote:
@Mike, @Petter: Did you realise that pam-python is AGPL? It means
that we cannot provide terminal servers or netbooting in Debian Edu
without placing a prominent link to pam-python's
On 6/5/21 12:55 am, Dominik George wrote:
@Mike, @Petter: Did you realise that pam-python is AGPL? It means
that we cannot provide terminal servers or netbooting in Debian Edu
without placing a prominent link to pam-python's sources on the
desktop…
Err, no. The requirement is [0]:
Notwith
4 matches
Mail list logo
