[Giorgio Pioda]
> Right yesterday I've setup an ltsp server and I've seen the home
> on the client are mounted via ssh. I'm missing something?
No idea, but I know that sshfs fail several of the test I made to
verify that a file system is usable as a home directory. See
http://people.skolelinux.or
Just a ltsp newbe question
> Except that ssh-fuse is not usable as a home directory. rename is not
> atomic, and umask is not properly handled. Both can cause problems. :)
Right yesterday I've setup an ltsp server and I've seen the home
on the client are mounted via ssh. I'm missing something?
[Giorgio Pioda]
> Well, if an alien machine sniff it, the attacker is well blocked at
> level of user auth. In principle machine auth is not so important as
> user auth since we are protecting homedirs and not services.
Yes, the home directory mount would be easier if only the user auth was
neede
Hi
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:55:54AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Giorgio,
>
> On Mi 23 Mai 2012 09:26:33 CEST Giorgio Pioda wrote:
>
> >last night I got a half a cent idea for Diskless stations Kerberization.
> >
> >What about exporting the chroot / file sistem containing a single
> >/etc/k
Hi Giorgio,
On Mi 23 Mai 2012 09:26:33 CEST Giorgio Pioda wrote:
last night I got a half a cent idea for Diskless stations Kerberization.
What about exporting the chroot / file sistem containing a single
/etc/krb5.keytab
containing all the nfs/disklessclients entries...
The single diskless
Hi,
last night I got a half a cent idea for Diskless stations Kerberization.
What about exporting the chroot / file sistem containing a single
/etc/krb5.keytab
containing all the nfs/disklessclients entries...
The single diskless unit should get its hostname via dhcp (assigned from MAC)
and the
6 matches
Mail list logo
