On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:09:38PM +0200, Herman Robak wrote:
> Apt is an awesome package manager framework. It has a lot of power!
> But it is a powertool with few safety features aimed at Joe Average.
> I don't think we want to advertise loudly the lack of such safety
> features. But unless w
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:57:08PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [José L. Redrejo RodrÃguez]
> > Not, I don't know of such package, but, loading by default
> > speedstep-centrino doesn't hurt in an AMD laptop (well, it just says
> > that's device doesn't exist). Doing it you cover most existi
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:57:11PM +0200, Martin Herweg wrote:
> Nicolas Pettiaux schrieb:
> > which is the default configuration on skolelinux now ?
>
> the default is still "LTSP" Thin Clients but this is the
> "MueKow" - Version of LTSP which needs more CPU,RAM and more time to boot.
> AFAIK De
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:09:38PM +0200, Andreas Schockenhoff wrote:
> Remark: The best automatic hardware detection for modern hardware and
> the X11 screen I have seen in ubunto/kubunto. (But not in ubuntos
> ltsp!)
Ubuntu thin clients use exactly the same hardware detection routines as the
r
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:19:35AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On topic of this thread: do you have some useful info on wether it is
> smart or not to move to 700MB images for Debian-edu?
>
> What is the reasoning behind keeping Ubuntu ISOs at 650MB?
Our reasoning was that an extra 50MB was
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:52:44PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Notice: If glancing in the direction of Ubuntu, remember that their aim
> is newer hardware only, so they can afford ignoring problems with some
> older machines.
I'm not sure where you got this impression; if you can tell me its
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:21:27PM +0100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> However, it does mean much less disk buffers/cache is used, and stuff
> read via nfs is more likely to be already buffered in RAM. It should
> make startup time faster if nothing else...
I don't think it would be significant; with >
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:52:38AM +0100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:39, Knut Yrvin wrote:
> > An interesting test about memory usage og LTSP from Jonathan Carter:
>
> It would be interesting to see the effect of "unifying" the LTSP chroot
> with the server (hardlinking iden
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:52:17PM +0200, David C. Weichert wrote:
> There is a Wiki for Zope/Plone (ZWiki). I find it very good. Ubuntulinux
> work with it for their documentation.
Ubuntu used ZWiki in the past, but we have since migrated to moin.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:59:50AM -0600, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> probably better than a symlink+ramdisk approach would be a tmpfs+bind
> mount approach, as it requires no (or few) tweaks of the NFS filesystem,
> and also works with standard debian kernels.
Agreed.
> i'd still like to explore
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:02:44PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Did I mention initrd-netboot-tools ?
I don't see anything in it which addresses the LTSP requirement of a
read-only root filesystem.
The network setup is already handled in my implementation by a simpler
approach based on initra
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:44:00AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
> > It also need some adjustment for the kernel used on the clients, as
> > it uses unionfs and also need to handle NFS root file system.
>
> I asked on #debian-kernel about unionfs, and Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:44:55PM +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> In that case, is there any possibility for the more complex auto-config
> procedure to be used on the first boot and cached in some way rather than
> be redone time and again? It sounds like /etc (or rather /) is mounted
> over nfs
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:41:49PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Jonas Smedegaard]
> > Did I mention initrd-netboot-tools ?
>
> Yes, but it seem to be solving a different problem, the problem of
> booting with an NFS root. unionfs is supposed to solve the problem of
> having to redirect al
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:05:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Do initramfs-tools add nfsboot-support to kernels without it compiled in?
Yes. There is an ITP open for it:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-wnpp/2005/06/msg00197.html
I don't know whether it has been uploaded yet.
--
- mdz
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:05:26PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> ltsp (0.37-0.0.pere.1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Changed dependencies (openssh-* -> ssh)
The openssh-* split is going to happen in Debian also now that Sarge has
been released.
> * Add long package descriptions.
> *
16 matches
Mail list logo
