debian-edu-archive-keyring_2014.10.13_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-10-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Missing Package-Type: udeb, see other mail. Ansgar === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Re: debian-edu-archive-keyring_2014.10.13_amd64.changes is NEW

2014-10-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Holger Levsen writes: > Thanks for your prompt feedback! > > On Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> Because for some reason debian-edu-archive-keyring-udeb is a "deb" >> package and not a "udeb" package, at least according to t

Re: debian-edu-archive-keyring_2014.10.13_amd64.changes is NEW

2014-10-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Holger Levsen writes: > On Montag, 13. Oktober 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> binary:debian-edu-archive-keyring-udeb is NEW. > > hm, actually, yes, why did it get into NEW? Because for some reason debian-edu-archive-keyring-udeb is a "deb" package and not a "udeb" package, at least according

Bug#757947: debian-edu-archive-keyring: does not remove keys on removal

2014-08-12 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: debian-edu-archive-keyring Version: 2014.02.27 debian-edu-archive-keyring uses apt-key add to add keys to apt's list of trusted keys, but does not remove them again when the package is removed. The easiest way to fix this is probably to just ship the keys in trusted.gpg.d instead as debi

Re: Bug#713049: pu: gosa - fix mass import of users in wheezy

2013-10-06 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 00:22 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: >> hm, when running "dak ls debian-edu-artwork" on coccia.d.o I see the today >> uploaded d-e-artwork package in the "accepted" suite, but this aint the case >> for "dak ls gosa" - any idea why? >> >> Same for s

Bug#709758: marked as pending

2013-07-15 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 07/15/2013 13:35, Holger Levsen wrote: > commit 34130ece41450e92cea0a007f24a0fcebbc8573b > Author: Holger Levsen > Date: Mon Jul 15 13:33:40 2013 +0200 > > Build-depend on texlive-lang-danish | texlive-lang-european and > texlive-lang-norwegian | texlive-lang-european to support buildin

Bug#709758: debian-edu-doc: build-depends on obsolete packages (texlive-lang-*)

2013-05-25 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Source: debian-edu-doc Version: 1.5~20130228~7.0 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid debian-edu-doc build-depends on obsolete packages that are no longer built by the current version of texlive-lang: * package texlive-lang-danish in version 2012.20120611-2 is no longer built from source - broke

Bug#569793: debian-edu-config: etcinsvk has been removed from unstable

2010-03-11 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
severity 569793 serious thanks Hi, I'm setting the severity to serious as etcinsvk has been removed[1] from unstable. Regards, Ansgar [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557074 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#571809: debian-edu-install: refers to etcinsvk which is scheduled for removal (and already uninstallable)

2010-02-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: debian-edu-install Version: 1.506 Severity: important Hi, debian-edu-install refers to "etcinsvk" in several places. This package is already uninstallable because "svk" was removed from Debian[1], and is scheduled for removal[2] itself. Regards, Ansgar [1] http://bugs.debian.org/55433

Bug#557074: Should etcinsvk be removed from Debian?

2010-02-14 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, now that svk has been removed from Debian the etcinsvk package is uninstallable and no longer of any use. Should it be removed from Debian as well? Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-edu-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...