t the unnecessary reordering
has no side-effects?
Would you mind repeating the (hopefully automated) proof for each Lenny
release candidate?
Thanks,
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dentify any benefit that cannot be
achieved with less disruption.
In short, the sole dubious identified benefit can be easily achieved
by an alternative approach that is non-disruptive.
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s for #281057 and #432893, and my implementation of `Breaks'
> support in dselect, are outstanding too, since early November.
For those like me with short memories, would you mind (re-)posting links to
the specs for Triggers and Breaks and any other features you're suggesting.
T
that could be better spent
programming or packaging or playing with the grandkids.
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian's productivity, and the teacher of such a
class might help Guillem develop his skills better than Ian could.
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri February 29 2008 09:26:32 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > I'm not a DD but I've been programming since 1963 when I was 7.
> > Based on decades of software engineering experience, I would
> > just like to remin
ature and have the new
developer restart development of the trivial new feature from scratch.
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aphael seems to have the power to block your packages but he has
no rational excuse. Can the tech committee overrule Raphael or
does Debian need to fork a dpkg under more sensible maintainers?
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
objects here
within 48 hours that Ian should proceed with his update?
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed March 5 2008 13:30:06 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed March 5 2008 12:29:08 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> I've been added to dpkg's Uploader a few weeks ago, I'm not dpkg's main
> >> coordinator.
On Wed March 5 2008 14:52:04 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Please post the URL for this policy. I apologize if you've already
> > posted and I missed it, but Google couldn't find it for me.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dp
d work their way up through
simpler programming tasks before taking on something as crucial as dpkg.
On the other hand, fer crissake Ian stop using 0 for NULL! You can use
(char*)NULL if it helps.
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
back to the
obstructionists. If Anthony has posted an explanation I have not seen
it. You will recall Anthony - he alienated many Debian developers with
the Dunk-Tank fiaco and thereby significantly delayed the release of Etch.
This apparently makes Anthony a natural ally of the dpkg blocking team.
On Sun March 9 2008 14:46:50 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 09/03/2008, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been
> > blocking updates for six months - including the triggers enhancement
> > which is needed for boot time improvements
>
On Sun March 9 2008 16:07:58 Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been blocking
> > updates for six months - including the triggers enhancement which is
> > neede
On Sun March 9 2008 17:30:51 Daniel Stone wrote:
> [Not subscribed, Cc if you want me to see it.]
>
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:19:58PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> > Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been blocking
> > updates for six months
>
&
Hi Guillem,
Ian wrote that you recently committed 402 diff lines of stuff
like this:
-static void usage(void) {
+void
+usage(void)
+{
It's easy to see negatives such as making it harder to merge
long-awaited features. What positives do you see for Debian?
--Mike Bird
h the task instead of time-wasting.
AFTER the long-delayed features have been merged and any remaining patches
have been picked up from the BTS would be an appropriate time to think
about refactorings.
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
ver developers-reference.
Ian appears to have chosen to speak truth to power rather than
forking. Do you have a constructive alternative to suggest?
--Mike Bird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to me like the exact opposite
of triggers pending.
Do I need to run "dpkg --configure --pending", and if so how
often?
--Mike Bird
Please respect reply-to debian-user as I'm not subscribed to
debian-dpkg.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat April 26 2008 19:15:45 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 03:06:04PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > > With today's 1.14.18 dpkg update in Testing, my initramfs-tools
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
