On 26/10/09 at 08:54 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 25/10/09 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Source: libgnucrypto
Hi Vagrant,
On 30/08/20 at 19:15 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Hi Lucas!
>
> I've appreciated all the work you've been doing with archive-wide
> rebuilds of Debian over the years!
>
> I'm looking into proposing to enable dpkg's
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=reproducible=+fixfilepath by default, furthe
On 31/08/20 at 09:35 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response! More in-line below.
>
> On 2020-08-31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 30/08/20 at 19:15 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >> I've appreciated all the work you've been doing
Hi,
On 23/09/20 at 14:39 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> > Proposed merge request adding a script that does just that:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/lucas/collab-qa-tools/-/merge_requests/9
>
> 2+ weeks on, any update on this? I keep coming across packages that
> wo
On 27/09/20 at 18:37 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/09/20 at 20:42 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2020-08-31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > On 31/08/20 at 09:35 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > >> On 2020-08-31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 07/09/20 at 20:42 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-08-31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 31/08/20 at 09:35 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >> On 2020-08-31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> > On 30/08/20 at 19:15 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> &g
On 10/05/22 at 17:29 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At today's ctte meeting we considered whether we can start a vote on
> this, but two committee members were missing, and someone else at the
> meeting reported that they hadn't yet been able to spend enough time
> thinking through the is
Thanks for your answer.
On 11/05/22 at 12:38 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I would love for there to be something like 3.0-with-git-diff. Indeed,
> I filed this wishlist bug to ask if contribution would be welcome:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007781
> but have not had any
On 11/05/22 at 17:29 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Bug#1007717: Draft resolution for "Native source
> package format with non-native version""):
> > Out of curiosity, if 3.0 (native) supported multiple tarballs, wouldn't
> &g
On 07/06/22 at 07:43 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:29:57PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > DRAFT
> >
> > Using its powers under constitution 6.1.5, the Technical Committee
> > issues the following advice:
>
> I've given this some thought and feel uneasy about
On 08/06/22 at 21:07 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Now we've turned a discussion about source package formats into a
> discussion about workflows and git. So when I reason about uniformity, I
> effectively want those idiosyncratic workflows to go away. If dgit
> requires 1.0-with-diff for now, then
On 08/06/22 at 21:07 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I think I take more issue with non-dgit git-first workflows than with
> dgit ones, because dgit is so well documented and is a workflow that is
> already shared by a noticeable fraction of the archive.
I'm curious: how do you measure dgit usage?
Hi,
On 15/06/22 at 07:32 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The other model restricts itself to only adding files below
> debian/ and then using debian/rules to actually apply patches during
> build. This latter model is fairly annoying, because there are so many
> different ways of doing it (i.e. we l
13 matches
Mail list logo
