On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 00:18:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> From: Charles Plessy
> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:14:42 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] Clarification of the format of control files, Closes:
> #501930, #593909.
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transf
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:32:17 +, Guillem Jover wrote:
>* On Linux use sync_file_range() to initiate asynchronous writeback
> of just unpacked files. Suggested by Ted Ts'o .
> Thanks to Jonathan Nieder . Closes: #605009
>* On non-Linux use posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED)
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:03:00 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> bup (0.17b-2squeeze1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
> .
>* use python-support to tightly version python dependency,
> needed due to the binary extensions. Thanks Jakub Wilk.
> Closes: #608568.
*sigh*
if you're g
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:31:56 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Also, I think we still have a reason for +b(something) as sometimes we
> just need to rebuild on a single architecture (because something
> strange has happend there), and I don't want to get rid of that
> ability.
>
The more I think
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 15:26:16 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:19:09PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:31:56 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > > Also, I think we still have a reason for +b(something) as sometimes
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 17:26:04 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >These dependencies must be added to the binary
> > package when it is built, since they may change
>
> This means packages must not hard-code library dependencies. It
> also seems like good policy, but I
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:23:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I know that in the long term you're in favor of moving the changelog in
> the package metadata and I agree with this plan. But IMO we must find
> an interim solution in the mean time.
>
Whatever solution ends up being chosen in the
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 14:51:32 +0200, bertagaz wrote:
> In an attempt to test upgrading Squeeze to Wheezy now that the Big Wheezy
> Freeze has come, it failed at the dist-upgrade step.
>
> I installed a fresh Debian Squeeze and tested from it.
>
> I wanted first to see if it would be possible
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711,
> which I'm not planning on fixing for wheezy as it would introduce
> regressions on other situations, and given that this behaviour has
> been around since the in
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 20:12:32 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Dpkg development has been happening pretty quickly lately, so there
> are a lot of changes between the versions in wheezy and sid.
>
At this point quick development should target experimental, not sid.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.as
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 15:14:15 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> That is of course, your perogative. However, if you could kindly prepare
> a patchset between 1.16.5 and whatever you want to migrate, with all the
> translation and documentation changes stripped out, lets see how big
> that is.
>
IT
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 14:19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 18:26:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > W/o having looked yet at the details I'd say this *seems* like #671711,
> > which I'm not planning on fixing for wheezy as it would
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:04:25 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> The current behaviour of triggers is well documented.
triggers.txt.gz says "Packages in t-awaited and t-pending demand
satisfaction of their dependencies just like package in installed". The
current behaviour doesn't seem to satisfy
, while dpkg, perl and doc-base are still the
squeeze version.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
o be linked against libcrypto,
> which is also missing when the dist-upgrade fails.
>
python2.7-minimal in wheezy does depend on libssl1.0.0. However that's
not enough to ensure unpack ordering.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Infor
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 14:25:12 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Okay, once more for the win. Here is the current version of the patch,
> incorporating substantial improvements from Jonathan Nieder and hopefully
> incorporating all the feedback in subsequent discussion.
>
> I'm looking for seconds
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 15:16:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I've mentioned this before, I find this completely unsatisfactory,
> because (at least):
>
> 1) the changelog stops representing the actual changelog of the
> package.
Irrelevant, that's already the case today for anything but t
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 13:14:51 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> One problem that that doesn't solve is what to do when a package would
> be able to borrow its /doc/ directory from another package
> (using a symlink) but for the changelog and copyright (which gets even
> harder when binnmus are in
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 14:14:20 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Also, it wouldn't help for the case of a binNMU on a subset of all arches
> since only some of them would have the entry. The solution proposed by ansgar
> cover this case.
No it doesn't. dpkg will still refuse to install a m-
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:26:01 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:09:17AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > On Sun, 12 May 2013, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > >
> > > I also added "through the interst or activate
> > > directives"
> > > after "When a configured package ac
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:27:19 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > About the problem of triggers being called with Depends not satisfied, can
> > you
> > give more explanations or suggest some text for the warning ? Would it be
> > enough to
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:00:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> does the current patch (attached) address your concerns ? If yes, would
> you second it ?
>
Sorry, I don't feel confident to second anything trigger-related.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:01:00 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> reassign 768156 dpkg,ucf
> thanks
>
> On Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 17:53:50 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, Michal Su
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:49:25 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> I'm happy if you change this - it seems like fixing a bug to me, but I
> will just throw in this observation from recent arm64 archive-rebuilds, that
> -j and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel= are not exactly the same. Is that
> expected? If not th
Hi Guillem,
dpkg-source in sid now picks up orig.tar.gz.asc files and lists them in
the source package. Unfortunately dpkg-source in jessie then explodes
on such source packages because it doesn't know what to do with them.
Arguably that would have called for a minor version bump, but in the
inte
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 19:47:19 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 13:12:37 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > dpkg-source in sid now picks up orig.tar.gz.asc files and lists them in
> > the source package. Unfortunately dpkg-source in jessie then
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 19:39:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> BTW, do you think it would make sense to cherry pick
> d01212f2d7e59fc713c66b5d60421ac2296c1463 in dpkg 1.17.x for stable,
> given that there's a point release quite soon, and then we could
> consider reenabling inclusiong of signature
Control: severity -1 normal
On 12/19/2016 10:58 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> On 2016-11-12 20:32 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2016-09-04 19:28 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>>> Control: tags -1 + patch
>>>
>>> The attached patch should fix the problem with arc
On 12/19/2016 02:41 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 13:59:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Control: severity -1 normal
>>
>> On 12/19/2016 10:58 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> Control: severity -1 serious
>>>
>>> On 20
clone 522858 -1
reassign -1 dpkg
kthxbye
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 17:45:33 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Since installing the latest version of tar, I'm getting failures in
> attempting to extract certain deb packages. For example, with
> telepathy-glib:
>
>
> frobozz:/tmp$ dpkg-source -x
reassign 530643 dpkg
retitle 530643 update-alternatives b0rkage?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reassign 530633 dpkg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reassign 532739 dpkg 1.15.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 14:24:57 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Given it's a dpkg bug and not a bug in eglibc, I think this should be
> handled by binNMU. Could the release team please schedule them? Thanks
> in advance.
>
As already mentioned, the issue with binNMUs here is they don't ensure
the
On 02/13/2018 04:29 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I believe that we have had quite some testing already last time and I
> would be surprised if we got many more RC bugs on dpkg that had to be fixed
> on a short timeframe. I guess nobody can give you any assurance but
> I'm sure that you can downgrad
35 matches
Mail list logo
