On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 23:19 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> after someone got bitten by #575891 while running a lenny chroot
> on a btrfs filesystem, Julien Cristau suggested me to try to fix this bug
> in stable.
>
> Would you accept a stable upload with the attached patch ?
Yes, please go ahead
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 12:12 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 23:19 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > after someone got bitten by #575891 while running a lenny chroot
> > > on a
Hi,
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 07:38 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Guillem Jover ]
> * Do not segfault on “dpkg -i --no-act”.
> * Add missing semicolon to the vsnprintf() compat declaration.
> Thanks to Robert Millan. Closes: #612203
> * Fix typo in «dpkg-name --overwrite» argument parsin
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:39 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:24:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming that the package has been tested in a Squeeze environment,
> > please go ahead; thanks.
>
> Yes it had been tested on squeez
Hi,
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 03:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> There's some (old) regressions affecting the dpkg 1.15.x series, and
> I'd like to upload a new 1.15.8.12 release targetting squeeze. Those
> fixes have been cherry picked from master, now uploaded to sid as
> 1.16.1 (that's why this re
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:45:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 03:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > There's some (old) regressions affecting the dpkg 1.15.x series, and
> > > I&
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 15:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:45:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 03:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > > There's s
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 08:39 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 15:50:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:45:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2011
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:00 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with merging unreviewed code, though, that among other
> > things might and do have design issues, as witnessed in the past. I also
> > have not seen Cyril jump to do any kind of code review dur
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 12:40 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Oh, and also, I want to see a specific ack/nack from the SRMs for:
> --- dpkg-1.16.4.3/debian/source/options 2012-06-09 14:32:05.0 +
> +++ dpkg-1.16.8/debian/source/options 2012-07-19 12:27:34.0 +
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 07:41 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-10-27 05:22, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [...]
> > dpkg-buildpackage: Honor new DEB_SIGN_KEYID environment variable
[...]
> Could you be convinced to change this to DEBSIGN_KEYID, which is the
> name that e.g. debsign uses? I have a
On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 16:58 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> [+ debian-admin, debian-wb-team ]
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 07:15:03AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
[...]
> > 12:33 < Ganneff> ftpmaster takes what dsa runs. dsa takes backports.
> > 12:35 < adsb> I'd suspect they'd prefer a stable updat
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:28 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> adding Adam because of request from Helmut (also added).
fwiw, if you're looking for a Release Team opinion on something that's
already public, CCing me personally often isn't the best way of getting
one.
Aside from the fact that you ma
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 19:01 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 22:19:28 +0200, David Suárez wrote:
> > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 19:10:03 David Suárez escribió:
> > > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 04:29:43 Guillem Jover escribió:
> > > > David, would it be possible to do a simp
Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev 1.17.27
Control: affects -1 devscripts
Control: retitle -1 dpkg-source -x overwrites existing directories
On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 18:08 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> dget unpacks the downloaded source by default, even if the target directory
> was
> pre-existing. Mo
reassign 293845 debconf
severity 293845 grave
close 293845
merge 293845 293666
thanks
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:27 +0100, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.10.26
> Severity: important
>
> When running apt-get upgrade I got this output. Note the syntax error
> right after fe
reassign 294098 debconf
severity 294098 grave
close 294098
merge 294098 293666
thanks
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 21:48 +0100, Nils R Grotnes wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Severity: normal
>
>
> After updating the system with Synaptic, the terminal output screen contained
> this error message:
>
>
> Str
On Monday, April 18, 2005 4:07 PM, Olleg Samoylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Default dpkg.conf include force-overwrite. This is improper. All
> "force" options must be setted by admin explicitly.
>
> Severity is grave because this can lead to significant data lost in
> unstable distrib. For inst
package dpkg
reassign 309790 emacs-goodies-el
thanks
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 18:21 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.10.27
> Severity: normal
>
> Recent install of dpkg-dev-el reads:
[...]
> Setting up debian-el (24.10-1) ...
> install/debian-el: Handling emacs21, logged
reassign 452806 dpkg
retitle 452806 [dpkg-parsechangelog] Please maintain trailing whitespace
kthxbye
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 11:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.10.10
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/dch
>
> When "dch -a" is called, it strips any whitesp
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
dpkg >= 1.14.17 generates *.changes files with Format: 1.8. They
provide new Checksums-*: fields which are similar to the Files:
field. And debsign edits in place the Files: field of changes file
and leaves the Checksums-* f
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 15:42 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> while investigating #476054 I discovered that debuild is really a fork of
> dpkg-buildpackage and no more a simple wrapper of it. (BTW the manual
> page is wrong... it says "It first runs dpkg-buildpackage" which is not
> the case unl
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I've just committed a set of patches to debuild:
[...]
+ Automatically preserve the (C, CPP, CXX, LD and F)FLAGS variables
and the corresponding *FLAGS_EXTEND variables
+ Add *FLAGS and *FLAGS_EXTEND support t
Hi,
On Sat, May 17, 2008 09:41, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
> I just got this error:
>
> Error: Changes files have different Format fields:
> puppet_0.24.4-6~bpo40~madduck+1_source.changes:Format: 1.8
> puppet_0.24.4-6~bpo40~madduck+1_amd64.changes.binonly:Format: 1.7
>
> and I wonder why mergech
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog wrote, Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:39 PM
On Sat, 17 May 2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 09:41, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
> > I just got this error:
> >
> > Error: Changes files have different Format fields:
> > puppe
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 11:19 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Well, but that doesn't answer the more fundamental question. What does
> an Architecture field like:
>
> i386 amd64 all
>
> in a *.dsc file mean? Currently, Policy is silent here.
That the binary packages referenced by the .dsc file
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 05:17 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 20:53:29 +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > Test case:
> >
> > start-stop-daemon --start -c 7eggert --exec `which sleep` 300
> >
> > Expected behaviour: Start as uid 1000
> > Real behaviour: Starts as uid 7
[...]
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 14:35 +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > BTW, I don't know (and I don't think I want to know either) what the
> > subject has to do with this, but it seems unnecessarily abrasive.
>
> Sorry, I was made aware of the bug because of the c
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 13:28 -0800, Count of San Francisco wrote:
> root@server:~# man 5 dpkg-dev
> No manual entry for dpkg-dev in section 5
> root@server:~# man 7 dpkg-dev
> No manual entry for dpkg-dev in section 7
>
> root@server:~# man dpkg-dev
> No manual entry for dpkg-dev
>
> There are no
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:38 PM, Samuel Thibault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott James Remnant, le mer 19 jan 2005 11:35:51 +, a dit :
>> On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 12:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>
>>> So as to have proper file name encoding, I'm used to have
>>> TAR_OPTIONS=--forma
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 17:27, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 08:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
> > Bug#171489: [INTL:es] dpkg: Spanish manpages available
> > Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> >
> Uh...
>
> What was your reason for reopening this? The n
package dpkg
# severity so bug states are the same
severity 249920 normal
merge 249920 158753
thanks
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 02:40, Dan Jacobson wrote:
[...]
> manpage says: -l | --list package-name-pattern ... List packages
> matching given pattern. If no package-name-pattern is
>
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 19:29, Dan Jacobson wrote:
[...]
> $ dpkg --status-fd 1 apt-move
> dpkg: need an action option
>
> OK, then the man page should say
>
> --status-fd
The man page quite clearly says
dpkg [options] action
with --status-fd being listed under `OPTIONS'. It q
On Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:14 PM, Daniel Lakeland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> package: dpkg
> version: 1.10.11
Just out of interest, why? That version of dpkg is over a year old, and is
not currently present in any of stable, testing or unstable.
> There is no way to easily get a listing
# BTS control
package dpkg
merge 284499 957
thanks control
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 21:28 +0100, Juergen Rinas wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.10.25
> Severity: wishlist
>
> dpkg should create a (never rotating) logfile that contains all
> action in the following way:
[...]
> This file should co
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 16:27 +, Alexander Pohl wrote:
> hello,
>
> the dpkg-www package browser doesn't give a package description for
> unavailable packages.
dpkg-www isn't maintained by the dpkg team, so this isn't really an
appropriate place to seek support for it.
The dpkg-www maintainer(
package dpkg
tags 286632 + patch
thanks
On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 8:43 AM, Bas van Sisseren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.10.25
> Severity: normal
>
> $ echo ' /' | /usr/bin/md5sum -c
> error processing /: failed in buffer_read(fd): m
37 matches
Mail list logo
