Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel?

2023-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Hi, it looks like enabling this flag on armel/armhf is a little bit premature. Apparently it's not completely supported upstream, and might cause regressions, according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522678 Is that a feature that the Debian ARM32 porters and the security team

Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel?

2023-11-23 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 10:45:33 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > it looks like enabling this flag on armel/armhf is a little bit premature. > > Apparently it's not completely supported upstream, and might cause > regressions, according to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522678 I

Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel?

2023-11-23 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello! On 2023-11-24 01:34, Guillem Jover wrote: > According to https://bugs.debian.org/918914#73 there were no pending > toolchain issues related to this. That is correct. The GCC maintainers at Arm confirm that stack-clash-protection is supported on 32 bit too. In case there are any bugs, whic