Ansgar writes:
> 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says
> | Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the
> | owner and universally readable (and executable, if appropriate),
> | that is mode 644 or 755."
> However most files shouldn't be modified as modifications will j
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ansgar writes:
> > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says
>
> > | Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the
> > | owner and universally readable (and executable, if appropriate),
> > | that is mode 644 or 755.
Guillem Jover writes:
> On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I assume this is in support of systems, containers, or jails where UID
>> 0 may not have CAP_FOWNER?
> If that's the reason, it certainly was not clear from the original
> report. :)
It seems like the context i
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 23:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Ansgar writes:
> > > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says
> > > > Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the
> > > > owner and universally readable (
4 matches
Mail list logo
