Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles

Hi, Quoting Philipp Kern (2014-07-25 14:45:17) > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:19:38PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Maybe. We'd be equally (if not more) happy if SRM would reconsider their > > decision (expressed on #debian-release toward Helmut Grohne) that these > > patches > > are too intru

Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles

I personally don't think it's a good idea to get such patches into stable. Anyway if someone wants to proceed anyway, here are a few things I spotted: Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28): > apt (0.9.7.9+deb7u2) wheezy-security; urgency=high > >* SECURITY UPDATE: apt-get source validation (closes

Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles

Hi, Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 16:40:49) > > diff -Nru apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols > > apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols > > --- apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols 2013-03-01 > > 10:51:21.0 + > > +++ apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debia

Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles

Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28): > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 16:40:49) > > > diff -Nru apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols > > > apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols > > > --- apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols 2013-03-01 > > > 10:51:21.0 +

Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles

Hi, Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 18:38:38) > Johannes Schauer (2014-07-28): > > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-07-28 16:40:49) > > > > diff -Nru apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols > > > > apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u3/debian/libapt-pkg4.12.symbols > > > > --- apt-0.9.7.9+deb7u2/debian/l

Debian binary diff

Hi all, In my work we are using debian obviously... But the most important part is that is an embedded system very particular. We are using ARM architecture and the constraint harder that we have is the bandwidth. It's really important to us reduce the amount of data when we update our syste

Re: Debian binary diff

Hi, Agustin Henze (2014-07-28): > Hi all, >In my work we are using debian obviously... But the most > important part is that is an embedded system very particular. We are > using ARM architecture and the constraint harder that we have is the > bandwidth. It's really important to us reduce

Re: Debian binary diff

On 07/28/2014 07:34 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I think you want to look at debdelta, which might be the right tool for > you. Great! I'll take a look, seems to be the solution to my problem :) Thanks, -- TiN signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature