Hello Raphaël,
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:20:22AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> > after the recent git update in testing the wrapper stopped working:
> >
> > ~/skripte/git-wrapper udpate
> > /home/helge/skripte/git-wrapper: invalid syntax
On Mar 04, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Also, why does refcounting have to be "perfect"?
> > What would break if it did not actually check that the two files
> > provided by the same package for different architectures are identical?
> Everything that can go wrong when splitting packages. You
Hi,
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I've already said elsewhere why I didn't reply to the RT mail, and while
> obviously I'm not them, I'd venture to say their (IMO unjustified) angry
> reaction has been (partially) due to your campaign of fear mongering...
There has been no such camp
I discount Hertzog completely. He has no patch that creates a release - but
words against words.
Prove it works for installing users with a widely accepted and applauded
release. You cannot yet.
Then you can say those point out minor failures are "fear mongering".
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 23:25:09 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 15:14:16 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > You have claimed numerous times that the branch was "unsound, buggy"
> > (implying that I'm crappy coder, etc.) and I would not take offense on
> > this if you were at the s
"John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell" writes:
> I discount Hertzog completely. He has no patch that creates a release -
> but words against words.
> Prove it works for installing users with a widely accepted and applauded
> release. You cannot yet.
> Then you can say those point out minor fa
6 matches
Mail list logo
