On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 03:58:42AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Replying to this now, because it appears some people seem to think
> mails that go unanswered are considered as accepted facts... ]
So be it.
> > work is also considered ready enough by other dpkg co-maintainers, by
> > the Rele
Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
> On the other hand I've also become disappointed after possibly realizing
> that Debian's culture seems to have been shifting into something different
> than what it was when I joined, where technical excellence seems to be
> less important than rushing
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Replying to this now, because it appears some people seem to think
> mails that go unanswered are considered as accepted facts... ]
Answering mails (when the other side is expecting an answer) is important
when you want to assume the leadership on dp
Hello,
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> after the recent git update in testing the wrapper stopped working:
>
> ~/skripte/git-wrapper udpate
> /home/helge/skripte/git-wrapper: invalid syntax
> /home/helge/skripte/git-wrapper update: update the current branch of the
> repos
Hello Raphaël,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 03:19:07PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > after the recent git update in testing the wrapper stopped working:
> >
> > ~/skripte/git-wrapper udpate
> > /home/helge/skripte/git-wrapper: invalid syntax
> > /home/
Thank you Christian,
My opion is ...
As to new developers rushing? Mark pkgs as "conflicts" or "alpha / beta" and major minor versions
correctly and you are fine :) a much bigger / free-er to submit contrib/ section would be nice.
I DEFINITELY have the option (1) DMs and DDs are PREVENTING
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 15:14:16 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > [ Replying to this now, because it appears some people seem to think
> > mails that go unanswered are considered as accepted facts... ]
>
> Answering mails (when the other side is expecti
Hi,
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> after the recent git update in testing the wrapper stopped working:
>
> ~/skripte/git-wrapper udpate
> /home/helge/skripte/git-wrapper: invalid syntax
It turns out the problem is not in the script, it's in what you typed.
"udpate" inste
Hi,
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> If I should simply "git push" and "git pull" thats fine with me as
> well, just last time this was not desired.
If you use "git pull --rebase" instead of "git pull", it should
be mostly fine.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Pre-o
Guillem Jover writes:
> On the other hand I've also become disappointed after possibly realizing
> that Debian's culture seems to have been shifting into something different
> than what it was when I joined, where technical excellence seems to be
> less important than rushing things out, patience
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Mar 01, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> The situation with refcounting seems much less fragile than the situation
>> without refcounting to me.
> I totally agree.
>
> Also, why does refcounting have to be "perfect"?
> What would break if it did not actually chec
Guillem Jover writes:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:32:38 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Guillem Jover writes:
>> > If packages have to be split anyway to cope with the other cases, then
>> > the number of new packages which might not be needed otherwise will be
>> > even smaller than the predicted
12 matches
Mail list logo
