Re: multiarch: dpkg-query segfaults

2011-11-27 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I verified and all thoses issues are fixed in my pu/multiarch/full > branch. Yes, checked. BTW, thanks for the new bisectable version of that tree. If I ran the world, there would be a pu/multiarch/testing branch that is bisectable and never gets rewinded (aka pu/multia

Re: Improving pre checkin requirements for man page translations?

2011-11-27 Thread Peter Krefting
Raphael Hertzog: Well, I always see a line with "jenkins" in it and "permission denied" on commit (can check the exact error message on next commit), so maybe for some reason not all checkins are triggering the rebuild? Oh, right this explains it then. I think I fixed it by adding commit right

Re: Improving pre checkin requirements for man page translations?

2011-11-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Peter Krefting wrote: > Raphael Hertzog: > > >>Well, I always see a line with "jenkins" in it and "permission > >>denied" on commit (can check the exact error message on next > >>commit), so maybe for some reason not all checkins are > >>triggering the rebuild? > >Oh,

Re: Review of pu/multiarch/master

2011-11-27 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 17:21:32 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I took some time to review your work in progress (pu/multiarch/master > while it was pointing to 5602d63c7669a9cb5ba293faff8cf85b3accc746). > > I have pushed some small fixes for you in pu/multiarch/for-guillem, > there are "fixup!" co

Re: multiarch: dpkg-query segfaults

2011-11-27 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 19:56:17 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Being the adventurous sort, I tried building and installing dpkg from > guillem/pu/multiarch/master. "dpkg" seems to work ok, but dpkg-query > is broken (it always segfaults). Sorry! I should have mentioned on my reply to your ma

Re: Multiarch interfaces

2011-11-27 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 15:57:59 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:45:06AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > Maybe we could have a "multiarch-config" binary package provided by > > > dpkg that only provides a debconf interface to enable/disable > > > supplementary architecture

Re: Multiarch interfaces

2011-11-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > Except for things like possibly firmware, which AFAIR there seemed to > > > be consensus should be kept as arch:all for now (otherwise they'd > > > require Packages file for lots of architectures), the rest require > > > run-time