Re: Some upcoming dpkg changes, test and feedback welcome

2011-09-22 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Raphael Hertzog [110921 22:52]: >>> [...] DEB_DISTRIBUTION [...] > But this is all wishful thinking at this point given that I have no use > case where some analysis of the distributions returned needs to be > portable across several derivatives and Debian itself. Sorry for again joining in lat

Re: Some upcoming dpkg changes, test and feedback welcome

2011-09-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > Sorry for again joining in late in the distribution, but what is the use > case of this field exactly? ifeq($(DEB_DISTRIBUTION),unstable) $(error GNOME 3 packages should be uploaded to experimental) endif Or rather: ifneq(,$(filter unstable,$(DEB

Re: Some upcoming dpkg changes, test and feedback welcome

2011-09-22 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Raphael Hertzog [110922 13:59]: > We can imagine more use cases in the context of other distributions than > Debian. Ubuntu for example could want to adjust the behaviour when > targetting a source packages for an older release (since they always use > the codename in that field). > > > Currentl

Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 15:23:10 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Given the number of disruptive changes, it's important to accompany > the upload with a d-d-a mail. I have thus prepared a draft here: > http://titanpad.com/wHeHZd9yrs Ok! Release tagged, pushed and uploaded. I reworded some things, a

Preparing stable release for squeeze (dpkg 1.15.8.12)

2011-09-22 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! There's some changes in the squeeze branch, and there's a new point release approaching, but usually a package including the fixes is required to have been in sid for a while, so we might be too late already. I'll be preparing the release and a mail later today to request SRM approval anyway.

Accepted dpkg 1.16.1 (source all amd64)

2011-09-22 Thread Guillem Jover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:00:11 +0200 Source: dpkg Binary: libdpkg-dev dpkg dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl dselect Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.16.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dpkg Developers Changed-By: Guillem Jo

Processing of dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.changes

2011-09-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: dpkg_1.16.1.dsc dpkg_1.16.1.tar.bz2 libdpkg-dev_1.16.1_amd64.deb dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.deb dselect_1.16.1_amd64.deb dpkg-dev_1.16.1_all.deb libdpkg-perl_1.16.1_all.deb Greetings, Your

Processing of dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.changes

2011-09-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dpkg_1.16.1.dsc dpkg_1.16.1.tar.bz2 libdpkg-dev_1.16.1_amd64.deb dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.deb dselect_1.16.1_amd64.deb dpkg-dev_1.16.1_all.deb libdpkg-perl_1.16.1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Guillem Jover wrote: > Ok! Release tagged, pushed and uploaded. > > I reworded some things, and added the new stuff since 1.15.7 that I > mentioned on my other mail. Hope to not have missed anything else > important/user visible. Please take a look, and feel free to send. Re the new triggers: |

dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-09-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: dpkg-dev_1.16.1_all.deb to main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.16.1_all.deb dpkg_1.16.1.dsc to main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.16.1.dsc dpkg_1.16.1.tar.bz2 to main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.16.1.tar.bz2 dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.deb to main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.16.1_amd64.deb dselect_1.16.1_amd64.deb to main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.16

Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > I reworded some things, and added the new stuff since 1.15.7 that I > mentioned on my other mail. Hope to not have missed anything else > important/user visible. Please take a look, and feel free to send. Thanks! It looks great, I made a few typo fi

Re: Proposal for a "Bits from dpkg developers"

2011-09-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It looks great, I made a few typo fixes, added a sentence wrt > Jonathan's concern and sent it. Thanks! (Just for the record, it was not really the maintainers that are unsure that I was worried about. ;-) And such a Pre-Depends is basically always safe, as long as the