On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > +# DEB_SOURCE_PACKAGE: the source package name
>
> Why DEB_SOURCE_PACKAGE instead of say, DEB_SOURCE? I guess it depends if
> we want to map to field names or to more descriptive (although probably
> redundant) variable names.
Yeah, for me the importa
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I took the commit out from my push because this was still under
> discussion, that does not mean I've changed my mind though and I
> still do not really feel comfortable uploading a dpkg defaulting
> to bind now.
[...]
> I've written some of this in some
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 09:02:39 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > +# DEB_DISTRIBUTION: the first distribution of the current entry in
> > > debian/changelog
> >
> > Why only the first, what makes it special? If there's multiple filter
> > can always be
Hi!
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:12:36 -0700, stu...@zulazon.com wrote:
> I tried to build dpkg from source under Mac OS X 10.6.8, and succeeded
> only by
>
> altering dpkg-linker.m4 to remove the -O1 flag the Apple linker ld didn't
> understand getting newer versions of autotools using the -i flag
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> So returning all the values is fine, and would be useful for other
> derivatives where more than one is actually allowed, and for Debian
> using equality should also be just fine (although using filter would
> be more correct, would avoid archive checks a
Hi!
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:00:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 06:18:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I still have some changed to push, which I'll be doing during today,
> > and a second push tomorrow or so, to give time for some more testing
> > before the upload. I'll
6 matches
Mail list logo
