* Guillem Jover [2009-05-17 04:15]:
> Dropping calls to install-info is something that we should probably
> only ask maintainers to do once the new install-info and dpkg packages
> are in testing. We should probably detangle those two steps in the wiki
> timeline.
Thanks, this answer my question
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> * dpkg vendor env settings.
>
> Now that Raphaël has implemented the dpkg-vendor program, those vars
> can be disabled w/o any problem.
Done.
> * Build flags env settings.
>
> Raphaël mentioned on IRC that we could wait a bit for this, but I
>
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I have sent out bug reports to all the packages shipping info files
> without dir section.
Thanks.
> I have added a usertag: texinfo-transition from prein...@debian.org to
> find these bugs.
It doesn't look like so, the following page is empty:
http
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 05:30:39AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 04:26:02 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 22:24:43 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:54:35PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 16 May 2009, Bill Allom
On Sun, 17 May 2009 16:20:41 +0200
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > * Build flags env settings.
> >
> > Raphaël mentioned on IRC that we could wait a bit for this, but I
> > think we rather stop exporting them now so that no more
> > maintainers start relying on them. We can always reenable them
>
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > So there's several options that come to mind for that:
> >
> > * We don't care, and expect users might miss docs on the dir file in
> > some cases or need to upgrade dpkg or any of the info-readers.
> > * Make info providing packages depend on
On So, 17 Mai 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It's the prein...@logic.at apparently:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=prein...@logic.at;tag=texinfo-transition
Ups, right, probably forgot to set the From correctly.
> > Next is I guess sending bug reports to info browsers that th
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
> Because use of dpkg-architecture - by definition - is not the default
> and therefore that it is one way of setting the environment variables
> necessary for non-standard builds, i.e. cross-builds.
Yes, but we export the variables in all cases and not on
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > So there's several options that come to mind for that:
> > >
> > > * We don't care, and expect users might miss docs on the dir file in
> > > some cases or need to upgrade dpkg
9 matches
Mail list logo
