On Fri, 15 May 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Norbert, can you go ahead with this transition RSN ?
(sorry, working as mountain guide makes me offlines now and then)
I have sent out bug reports to all the packages shipping info files
without dir section. I have added a usertag: texinfo-transition
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> This means that if I fix this bug and upload right now the jed package to
> unstable, it will fail to install the info files. Am I missing something
> or have the regarding packages just been uploaded?
Yes, that is true, please wait with uploads (w
Hi Bill,
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Does Lenny includes this trigger ?
No.
> Did you consider what will when a partial lenny to squeeze update is made ?
Yes. If the new texinfo/install-info is installed it will work on the
triggers. Packages that are old will call install-inf
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:54:35PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Sat, 16 May 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Does Lenny includes this trigger ?
>
> No.
>
> > Did you consider what will when a partial lenny to squeeze update is made ?
>
> Yes. If the new texinfo/install-info i
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 12:11:04 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Another option could be to add a new modifier, like P(rivate) or
> > U(ser), to be used like XPBS-Field: which would preserve the X-. But
> > then you need a new enough dpkg-dev to be able t
Hi!
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 21:39:51 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > This means that if I fix this bug and upload right now the jed package to
> > unstable, it will fail to install the info files. Am I missing something
> > or have the regarding p
Hi!
Just in case this was not clear from the bug report, and as exmplained
on bug 528877, for now the info files should just get the missing info
dir entry added. Once the new install-info and dpkg packages have
migrated to testing maintainers should be able to start dropping the
direct calls to i
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 09:08:16 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Also the same logic we apply for the removal of the substvar support
> > could be applied to most of the “Build options” as well, as those do
> > not make sense in the normal build for offic
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 04:26:02 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 22:24:43 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:54:35PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > > On Sat, 16 May 2009, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > Does Lenny includes this trigger ?
> > >
> > > > D
Hi!
So here's the list of things I consider blockers for next 1.15.1 release
targetting unstable, or that at least we should discuss here if you
think otherwise. The main reason for this is that those are either new
interfaces which should not be exposed to avoid users starting to use
them. Or old
10 matches
Mail list logo
