On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 19:07:12 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I just wrote it. I had to do it in C otherwise I couldn't do the check
> on how it's called.
Cool!
> > Why? What would change? info-browsers (see below) should depend on
> > install-info,
Hello,
last year I reported
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471747 against
sbuild and we hold off changing dpkg-source's output due to that
bug in the (neuro-maintained) sbuild used by buildd.
Now I scheduled the output change for dpkg 1.15.2 which will hit
unstable in the upcomi
Hector Oron writes:
> Hello,
>
>> The toolchain does not yet look in all the right places. Neither for
>> the multiarch nor the corss-compile way of putting the prefix. It is
>> in a state where both ways are used and neither is complete enough for
>> a full system.
>
> So, would it be fine to se
Hallo Raphael,
am Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:58:21AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> Do you know if those sbuild use the host dpkg-source or the chroot one?
as far as I can see neuro's sbuild only does a chroot for dpkg-buildpackage
and some script invocations.
> In the former case, there's
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Actually, if called with an absolute path, the warning should ask the
> caller to not use such absolute path (maybe as a side note, explain
> the rationale, because it's generally wrong, and in this case because
> it will stop working if using /usr/s
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> am Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:58:21AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > Do you know if those sbuild use the host dpkg-source or the chroot one?
>
> as far as I can see neuro's sbuild only does a chroot for dpkg-buildpackage
> and some script invo
Hi guys,
I am a bit lost ATM what *I* have to do at the moment?
On Mo, 16 Mär 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> dictate what's done and the other one is a wrapper. The fact that
> the install-info package decided to make it a wrapper too (as opposed to
> "patch ginstall-info to have the desired beh
On Mo, 16 Mär 2009, Nicolas François wrote:
> > - file bugs against all the info shipping packages with problematic info
> > files
>
> Maybe recommend that install-info should be called without options but the
> info files themselves should be updated.
> And --section shall be avoided (this is I
Hello Santiago,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Sorry for not answering this before. Is this something that you would
> > like to see implemented in lenny?
>
> It's not required for lenny. The code making use of this is only in dpkg
> 1.
Hey!
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:34:51 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I can add print this additionnal information in case there's no
> /urs/bin/install-info and we have DPKG_RUNNING_VERSION set.
Checking now the new warning, it might also make sense to print the
package involved from DPKG_MAINTSCR
10 matches
Mail list logo
