Hi,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 12 Mär 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Relying on the order inside PATH is too fragile IMO. If you want to have
> > the binary as install-info directly, you'll have to wait until
> > install-info is not used any more by debian packages, i.
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:54:49PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> > install anything but libraries and headers into /usr/ -- so I
> > don't think there is a pressing need to replicate a filesystem hierarchy
> > standard below a triplet directory.
> That is what GNU people expect when building c
Hello Simon,
> As far as I've understood, --with-sysroot gives the path to the target OS
> installation so the build can run "fixincludes" and add it to the search
> paths; since it should work with a largely unmodified snapshot of the
> target OS, they are pretty tolerant with the directory layou
Dear Sir,
Filmex is offering Catalogue Desingin, Photography, Broucher Designing
Domain Registration & Printing Service for more information contact at:
FILMEX STUDIOS
Azam Block, Model Town,
Sialkot 51310 Pakistan.
Telephone: +92 52 3259477 - 3559480
Mobile: +92 300 871 4800
Email: fil...@gmail.
Hi,
> >, since
> > they have entirely different objectives
> Not entirely different - the objective for the packaging tools is
> actually the same, to have packages install cleanly without changes on
> systems with a different architecture triplet.
I'm not sure this can be achieved at all, as we
Hello,
>>> , and there is generally no need to
>>> install anything but libraries and headers into /usr/ -- so I
>>> don't think there is a pressing need to replicate a filesystem hierarchy
>>> standard below a triplet directory.
>
>> True, however, that is not a sufficient reason to not
>> move
Hi all,
On Fr, 13 Mär 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That looks almost right. I hope Guillem can confirm that it's ok for him
> as well.
That would be great.
> > 1) /usr/sbin/install-info from dpkg
> > this one will do:
> > . if called with absolute path, warn the user to use
> > /usr/bi
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > The Breaks: added to dpkg ensures that info browsers have the right
> > dependency on install-info. That's enough, there's no reason to die.
>
> Ok, who is going to write the dpkg install-info wrapper?
I just wrote it. I had to do it in C otherwise
Hi Raphael,
thanks a lot for the work.
On Fr, 13 Mär 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I just wrote it. I had to do it in C otherwise I couldn't do the check
> on how it's called.
Ok, fine.
> > Why? What would change? info-browsers (see below) should depend on
> > install-info, but if they don't w
[ Bcced to -devel and -dpkg, discussion should happen on -policy ]
Hello,
we have an unfortunate situation where the practice in dpkg-buildpackage
and the policy do not match fully.
I tried to summarize the problem here:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/DebianRules
I want to resolve this probl
10 matches
Mail list logo
