dpkg_1.14.16.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dpkg_1.14.16.2.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.2.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.2_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.2_i386.deb
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Accepted:
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.2_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.14.16.2_all.deb
dpkg_1.14.16.2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.2.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.2.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.2_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:05:22 +0200
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.14.16.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi.. i was tryng to upgrade from etch to sid.. but after a while apt sad me
that was impossible to upgrade dpkg because there where broken dependences...is
there something to do? sorry for my english..
Hello,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Lorenzo wrote:
> hi.. i was tryng to upgrade from etch to sid.. but after a while apt sad
> me that was impossible to upgrade dpkg because there where broken
> dependences...is there something to do? sorry for my english..
Yes, wait a bit and retry once dpkg 1.14.16.2
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: ChangeLog handling and git wrapper for
translators"):
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * When we want complete and accurate commit history, use git log.
>
> For us, it's good enough. But generating a ChangeLog file doesn't cost us
> much and it can be us
Raphael Hertzog writes ("parse_changelog modification, dpkg-genchanges
refactoring"):
> With Frank, we thought that instead of calling dpkg-parsechangelog in the
> parse_changelog function, it ought to work in the opposite direction:
> dpkg-parsechangelog should call parse_changelog() to do its jo
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Review of file exclusion branch requested"):
> Thanks for working on this. For next time please use git-format-patch,
> it makes it easier to review, also it allows one to fix the patches
> and resend.
As an alternative I think we should be happy to pull from a git branc
dpkg_1.14.16.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dpkg_1.14.16.3.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.3.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.3_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.3_i386.deb
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Accepted:
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.3_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.14.16.3_all.deb
dpkg_1.14.16.3.dsc
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.3.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.3.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.3_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.3_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:39:59 +0200
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.14.16.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg_1.14.16.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dpkg_1.14.16.4.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.4.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.4_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.4_i386.deb
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Accepted:
dpkg-dev_1.14.16.4_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.14.16.4_all.deb
dpkg_1.14.16.4.dsc
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.4.dsc
dpkg_1.14.16.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.4.tar.gz
dpkg_1.14.16.4_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.16.4_i386.deb
dselect_1.14.16.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:44:32 +0200
Source: dpkg
Binary: dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.14.16.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpkg Developers
Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Review of file exclusion branch requested"):
> > Thanks for working on this. For next time please use git-format-patch,
> > it makes it easier to review, also it allows one to fix the patches
> > and resend.
>
> As an alternative
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("parse_changelog modification, dpkg-genchanges
> refactoring"):
> > With Frank, we thought that instead of calling dpkg-parsechangelog in the
> > parse_changelog function, it ought to work in the opposite direction:
> > dpkg-parsech
16 matches
Mail list logo