On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:53:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > dpkg-genchanges is easy insofar that not many programs actually need
> > to read .changes files (dak, dput, and dupload come to mind). So we
> > mostly just can increase the format n
Hi,
this is mainly for djpig since it relates to stuff we discussed on
#debian-dpkg, however I post it here so that others have the opportunity
to comment as well.
With Frank, we thought that instead of calling dpkg-parsechangelog in the
parse_changelog function, it ought to work in the opposite
By default, include orig tarballs only if the current upstream version
differs from the previous changelog entry. Closes: #28701
---
man/dpkg-genchanges.1 |9 -
scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl | 31 ---
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
di
* scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl: Some code refactoring. Also fix the
generation of the Description field to not have duplicate description
in case of udeb (a single description per binary package is enough).
---
scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl | 88 +---
1 files c
* scripts/Dpkg/Changelog.pm (parse_changelog): Rewrite it completely
to not call dpkg-parsechangelog but do the work of this program by itself.
* scripts/dpkg-parsechangelog.pl: Rewrote it to use the enhanced
parse_changelog() function.
* scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl, script/dpkg-gencontrol.pl: Adapt
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 08:18:12 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The Format substvar is not set anymore.
>
> Indeed, that was on purpose. It wasn't used by the code as a substitution
> but only like a general purpose variable (which I really created as i
6 matches
Mail list logo
