On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:22:55AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Is anyone reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] here that would be bothered if they
> received
> the BTS mails related to dpkg ?
I wouldn't be bothered by that change.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:05:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Thus I'm wondering if we shouldn't follow the linux development model.
> Have a cycle of say one month, merge stuff aggressively during 10 days,
> make an upload to experimental and run the new dpkg on our own computers
> during 20
* scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl, scripts/dpkg-source.pl: Convert
all checksum handling code to use the new module.
---
scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl | 34 --
scripts/dpkg-source.pl | 40
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4
---
scripts/Dpkg/Checksums.pm | 57 +
scripts/Makefile.am |1 +
scripts/po/POTFILES.in|1 +
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 scripts/Dpkg/Checksums.pm
diff --git a/scripts/Dpkg/Checksums.pm b/scri
* scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl: Allow using another
checksum program. Increase changes format to 1.8.
---
man/dpkg-genchanges.1 |7 +++
scripts/dpkg-genchanges.pl | 10 --
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/dpkg-genchanges.1 b/man/dpkg-genchang
* scripts/dpkg-source.pl: Allow using another
checksum program. Set source format to 3.0 in
that case. This will currently prevent dpkg-source
from extracting such a package, but until 3.0
is actually defined, we have no other choice.
* man/dpkg-source.1: Document new option.
---
man/dpkg-source.1
---
man/dpkg-buildpackage.1 |4
scripts/dpkg-buildpackage.pl |9 ++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1 b/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1
index 2a84119..c2f9cc3 100644
--- a/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1
+++ b/man/dpkg-buildpackage.1
@
This patch series first refactors the checksum code into an own module
Dpkg::Checksums. It then adds support for sha1 and sha256 in addition
to md5sum. So far no real changes.
The interesting parts for comments is the addition of the --checksum
options to dpkg-genchanges and dpkg-source.
dpkg-gen
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> dpkg-genchanges is easy insofar that not many programs actually need
> to read .changes files (dak, dput, and dupload come to mind). So we
> mostly just can increase the format number and let other people worry
> about whether they want support t
9 matches
Mail list logo