> > Small nitpick. Thru is a correct simplified spelling of through. It might
> > sound more correct to spell it through though, so I guess the change is
> > fine.
> > But then I'm not a native speaker...
> Thru for through is rare in idiomatic US English. It looks either archaic
> or like an in
Guillem Jover writes:
> Hi!
> On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 18:32:36 +0200, Omar Campagne wrote:
>> diff -rupN man/dpkg.1 mannew//dpkg.1
>> -additional options set on the command line, and thru this file descriptor,
>> +additional options set on the command line, and through this file
>> descriptor,
Hi!
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 18:32:36 +0200, Omar Campagne wrote:
> diff -rupN man/dpkg.1 mannew//dpkg.1
> -additional options set on the command line, and thru this file descriptor,
> +additional options set on the command line, and through this file descriptor,
Small nitpick. Thru is a correct si
Hi,
On Sat, 22 May 2010, Omar Campagne wrote:
> There is also this "strange" thing on line 379 in the file "man/dpkg.1".
>
> \fBhold\fP:
> Process packages even when marked "hold".
>
> I guess its "--force-hold" there. Didn't include it in the patch.
No, it's fine, the "--force" part is omitted
Oops, missed changes in dpkg.1 in the patch. Resending diff against
latest source.
--
Omar Campagne Polaino
diff -rupN man/dpkg.1 mannew//dpkg.1
--- man/dpkg.1 2010-05-22 18:24:13.0 +0200
+++ mannew//dpkg.1 2010-05-22 18:28:21.0 +0200
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ only for compatibility with
Hello:
I finally finished the revision, which took me way longer than
expected..
Before sending the po to the spanish list, I would be grateful if anyone
could apply the patch (minor typos) as well as to trigger an update of
the pot/po files so I can catch any new changes done to the manpages, as
6 matches
Mail list logo
