On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Architecture: all packages are treated the same as packages for the native
> arch, right? Including having all their metadata stored in the directory
True, I forgot about this. Thanks for the reminder.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
F
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:19:20AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > As I mentioned on the IRC channel, and to Steve in particular when he
> > mentioned the Ubuntu dpkg upload, the current db layout is defintely
> > not the final one. It has several probl
Hi,
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> As I mentioned on the IRC channel, and to Steve in particular when he
> mentioned the Ubuntu dpkg upload, the current db layout is defintely
> not the final one. It has several problems, mainly of fragility as you
> point out.
What's fragile? It's i
Hi!
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:41:47 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I noticed this
> > > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/727106) while doing
> > > a debootstrap test
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I noticed this
> > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/727106) while doing
> > a debootstrap test of natty. I think we need to be consistent about the
> > compatibility
Hi Colin,
following up on debian-dpkg@ since others might want to weigh in.
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed this
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/727106) while doing
> a debootstrap test of natty. I think we need to be consistent about the
> co
6 matches
Mail list logo
