Hello everyone,
First of all an apology for the late response from the APT Team side,
but Michael Vogt is currently a bit busy with work, family stuff and
advising and helping me, so the intern discussion last a bit longer
and i don't want to enter the discussion with my half baked ideas. ;)
Seco
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> PS: anyone talked to the cupt maintainer about this?
>
Hello there.
Description-md5: cupt doesn't use it at all. Harmless.
Moving English descriptions out from Packages: I support this. I don't expect
any breakage for en_{US,GB}.UTF-8 locales' users, but however if i
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> On 11841 March 1977, Nicolas François wrote:
>
>>> which should be easy enough to output. When such an output file is
>>> configured, the descriptions should no longer get written to the
>>> Packages files.
>> I'm not sure that will be sufficient, unless the Description-md
* Nicolas François [090813 10:14]:
> > Think like s/md5/sha256/ or so :)
>
> That should be doable;)
>
> Note that the probability of a collision (Description are controlled by
> trusted people), and the consequences of a collision (a wrong long
> description is displayed), do not make me too afra
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:55:04AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Why not inject the english version in the Translation file for all missing
> > translations? That way you download only one Translation file and you have
> > the usual behaviour. And
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:55:04AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Why not inject the english version in the Translation file for all missing
> translations? That way you download only one Translation file and you have
> the usual behaviour. And you can see programmatically that it's not
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11841 March 1977, Nicolas François wrote:
>
> >> which should be easy enough to output. When such an output file is
> >> configured, the descriptions should no longer get written to the
> >> Packages files.
> > I'm not sur
I'm jumping late in the discussion, please bear with me if it has been
answered before. I'll leave Guillem comment on the dpkg/dselect impact.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > * We may also need to decide what should be the user interface when a
> >description translation is not
On 11841 March 1977, Nicolas François wrote:
>> which should be easy enough to output. When such an output file is
>> configured, the descriptions should no longer get written to the
>> Packages files.
> I'm not sure that will be sufficient, unless the Description-md5 field is
> added to the Packa
Hi Jörg,
(I'm adding dpkg. See the original mail there:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-l10n-devel/2009-August/000507.html)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:47:46AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> [...]
> It will also mean changes to apt-ftparchive, so lets get to the apt
> maintainers:
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
