Re: supporting seemless package renames

2010-04-08 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> On Thursday 08 April 2010 15:52:19 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >>> Hmm, sounds like a bug in policy. I think disappeared packages ought >>> to receive prerm. Would you like to raise the issue, or should I? >> Disappeared packages do not receive

Re: supporting seemless package renames

2010-04-08 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > On Thursday 08 April 2010 15:52:19 Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Hmm, sounds like a bug in policy. I think disappeared packages ought >> to receive prerm. Would you like to raise the issue, or should I? > > Disappeared packages do not receive prerm because of complicated

Re: supporting seemless package renames

2010-04-08 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
On Thursday 08 April 2010 15:52:19 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > > Firstly, I'd ask you next time you CC de...@l.d.o, CC > > c...@packages.debian.org as well. > > CC added. Thanks. > > Secondly, AFAIK, Guillem Jover some time ago added a notice of > > disappeared packages

Re: supporting seemless package renames

2010-04-08 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Firstly, I'd ask you next time you CC de...@l.d.o, CC > c...@packages.debian.org > as well. CC added. > Secondly, AFAIK, Guillem Jover some time ago added a notice of disappeared > packages to --status-fd dpkg output, so theoretically any high-level package