Re: dpkg upload 1.15.8.2

2010-08-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Actually, the strict dependencies introduced in 1.15.8.2 should have > > been there in 1.15.8, so the fact they were missing was just a bug > > (and a helpful one, or all the archi

Re: dpkg upload 1.15.8.2

2010-08-01 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Actually, the strict dependencies introduced in 1.15.8.2 should have > been there in 1.15.8, so the fact they were missing was just a bug > (and a helpful one, or all the architectures would have suffered the > same fate :). > >

Re: dpkg upload 1.15.8.2

2010-08-01 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Regardless of the above, I'm sorry this caused you guys major > inconveniences. A positive outcome though, is that a bug was unvelied. > I'll be uploading .3 tomorrow, just in case anything else pops up. I'm getting empty binary pack

Re: dpkg upload 1.15.8.2

2010-08-01 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 13:48:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > next time, when uploading a piece as critical as dpkg, please look at the > archive state before uploading. dpkg 1.15.8.2 had so strict dependencies > that it could not be built anymore (due to debhelper, dpkg-dev and > libdpkg-perl