Re: dpkg transactions

2015-01-30 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:39:36PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Ok, coming back to this, now that the big stuff has passed by. Be warned > this is a long reply, though. :) This isn't going to be short either and I don't even reply to everything as "big stuff" isn't really over for me and given th

Re: dpkg transactions

2015-01-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello! 2015-01-13 21:39, Guillem Jover: > [ Adding apt and cupt back into the CCs, as this is frontend related, > as I'm not sure if you all are subscribed to debian-dpkg. ] I am subscribed, but thanks, maybe even there is someone interested reading Cupt mailing lists :) The "dpkg line" seems

Re: dpkg transactions

2015-01-13 Thread Guillem Jover
[ Adding apt and cupt back into the CCs, as this is frontend related, as I'm not sure if you all are subscribed to debian-dpkg. ] Hi! Ok, coming back to this, now that the big stuff has passed by. Be warned this is a long reply, though. :) On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 18:40:32 +0100, David Kalnischki

Re: dpkg transactions

2014-11-23 Thread David Kalnischkies
(splitting of from #766758 as it is of topic for the RC bug) On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:24:16PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > And w/o wanting to get tiresome with this, take into account that > frontends that use any of the dpkg --force-* options as normal course > of action, will most probably pr