Hi!
On Sat, 2023-03-18 at 15:34:25 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Thank you all! I've queued the attached patch which I'll be pushing to
> git shortly.
Had missed one file! Updated patch attached.
Thanks,
Guillem
From f164eb0bc774e5db480341369ef3fd72efa21509 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 15:21:40 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > This is something that has been bothering me for a long time, so the
> > other day I sat down and did a full license audit of the sources.
> >
> > I've cleaned up the license headers a
> Envoyé: Jeudi 16 Mars 2023 19:20:46
> Objet: Re: License audit on dpkg source tree
> Hi,
> I am 'Andy W P Guy' who wrote dpkg-ftp. My current email address
> is a...@cyteen.org . I am happy to re-licence the work I did as GPL-2
> or
> any future version of
Hi,
I am 'Andy W P Guy' who wrote dpkg-ftp. My current email address
is a...@cyteen.org. I am happy to re-licence the work I did as GPL-2 or
any future version of GPL.
Andy Guy
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 17:32, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [ Bringing back this old thread, as there is still one u
Hi. Yes, I'm fine re-licensing my contribution with the same licenses as the
rest of the codebase.
Christian
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, March 6th, 2023 at 19:43, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> [ Bringing back this old thread, as there is still one unsolved item
>
Hi!
[ Bringing back this old thread, as there is still one unsolved item
from the old list, and realized afterwards that there were more
authors involved, not mentioned on the original thread, which I'd
like to have their answer on record to decide how to proceed in
the future. ]
On Thu,
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: License audit on dpkg source tree"):
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:21:29 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (If at some point you feel like updating my email address in the
> > various notices, to ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk, please do. But
> >
Hi!
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:21:29 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (If at some point you feel like updating my email address in the
> various notices, to ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk, please do. But
> it's not important so only do it if it's very easy.)
I've done this now, except for the ones in
[resent; first copy failed due to mua bug]
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: License audit on dpkg source tree"):
> Thanks all! I'm going to push the attached patch. Hope the S-o-b are
> fine.
LGTM, thanks.
(If at some point you feel like updating my email address in the
vari
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Thanks all! I'm going to push the attached patch. Hope the S-o-b are
> fine.
Sure, fine for me.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debi
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 15:21:40 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I've cleaned up the license headers and added missing ones, as a side
> > effect “licensecheck -r dpkg” works better now. There's still lots of
> > copyright statements missing, I have
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 20:41:26 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes ("Re: License audit on dpkg source tree"):
> > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
> >
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: License audit on dpkg source tree"):
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
>
> > * lib/dpkg/utils.c: GPL-2 only
> >
> > Thi
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog (Do 15 Apr 2010 15:21:40 CEST):
>
> I'm expecting some bounces, most likely that the email of Andy Guy and
> Heiko Schlitterman are not valid anymore. I found an alternative email for
> Heiko but no clear trace of Andy Guy (the name is quite common
> unfortunately). Does anyo
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This is something that has been bothering me for a long time, so the
> > other day I sat down and did a full license audit of the sources.
> >
> > I've cleaned up the license headers and added missing ones
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is something that has been bothering me for a long time, so the
> other day I sat down and did a full license audit of the sources.
>
> I've cleaned up the license headers and added missing ones, as a side
> effect “licensecheck -r dpk
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 19:47:44 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Ok cool, I'll be applying tthe following patch then.
This is done now.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 21:29:47 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I don't recall it being significant. The patch you sent is fine by me.
Thanks committed.
> (The same may apply to Ian's and James' contributions to this file, but
> you'd have to ask them about that.)
I thought about that too, but as t
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:59:52PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:29:31 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yeah, looks like I did at least some of this on work time. Please go
> > ahead and make that change, although I think it is useful to have
> > authors documented as well a
Hi!
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:29:31 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:13:25AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
> >
> > > * scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Ubun
Hi!
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:38:06 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Frank would you sign off such change?
>
> Changing the license back from GPL-2 only to GPL-2+?
>
> Yeah, that would be fine by me.
Ok cool, I'll be applying tthe following patch then.
thanks,
guillem
>From 72dcd49ffb8546f
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:13:25AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
>
> > * scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Ubuntu.pm:
> >
> > Copyright © 2008 Colin Watson
> >
> > This might ac
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:20:11AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
> >
> > * lib/dpkg/showpkg.c: GPL-2 only
> >
> > Used to be GPL-2+ with all commits © by Wichert Akker
Hi Frank!
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
>
> * lib/dpkg/showpkg.c: GPL-2 only
>
> Used to be GPL-2+ with all commits © by Wichert Akkerman, until
> commit 6e1eb71ebffbbaca2e4bc when it changed to G
Hi Ian!
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
> * lib/dpkg/utils.c: GPL-2 only
>
> This file started as GPL-2 only with commit a4f9322a6417e1683183ea
> by Wichert Akkerman, which only included cisdigit()
Hi Colin!
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 18:11:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
> * scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Ubuntu.pm:
>
> Copyright © 2008 Colin Watson
>
> This might actually be © Canonical Ltd.?
Is that the case?
thanks,
guillem
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
